User talk:Nirvana2013/Archive 3

Flexi-vegetarianism
Do not move this page without gathering consensus, especially considering the POV-pushing motive of such a change. MinYinChao (talk) 17:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Francisofassisi.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Francisofassisi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Francis Lucille
Hi, I have found your usernames from the sprirituality section. I need your help and suggestion. I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher. but,I am facing an problem.

The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion. i need your help urgently. so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc. As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them. could you please help amd and take a look at article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Lucille http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.

Appreciate all your help.

Thanks Amarhindustani Amarhindustani (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Christian Anarchism
That was my edit you undid; it was not vandalism, see the post on the talk page. Gabr-  el  21:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

FAR notice for Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
nominated Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.Cirt (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

What is the purpose of one's life? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What is the purpose of one's life?. Since you had some involvement with the What is the purpose of one's life? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 17:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Gandhi in World War I
Hi Nirvana2013. I like the overall addition of this section to the article but we need to be careful about what we say there. The Charlie Andrews criticism, for example, stands out for several reasons. First, Andrews was writing after the war and so the 'at that time' is not accurate. Second, Andrews says he could not reconcile this act with other acts of Gandhi. This does not necessarily imply that he was critical of Gandhi regarding the recruitment. Third, Andrews is just one person and is not a scholar on Gandhi. My feeling is that this must be the subject of comment by Gandhi scholars and summarizing the way they perceived the recruitment is likely a better way to go (Desai, for example, says The question of the consistency between his creed of 'Ahimsa' (non-violence) and his recruiting campaign was raised not only then but has been discussed ever since so there must be scholarly material on this). (Also, the contrast with the Boer War is not made by the source, at least I couldn't find it, and the source is primary, so you might want to remove that.)

As a final matter, do you want to take this article back to Featured status? I can help if you're willing to take the lead. I think it is fairly close but needs leg work. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 12:07, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IceGold


The article IceGold has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CORP. No third party sources, Google web search, news search fail to produce any.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 15:54, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Late-twentieth century commodity prices
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Late-twentieth century commodity prices. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Late-twentieth century commodity prices. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of How to buy silver
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 12:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Elliott


The article Michael Elliott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ACADEMIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cptmurdok (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:46664 concert.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:46664 concert.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Akers


The article Keith Akers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wholly unreferenced BLP that gives no indication of the subject's meeting the notability guidelines at WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. +Angr 22:39, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Berrigan Brothers
I have nominated Berrigan Brothers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Berrigan Brothers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  — fetch ·  comms   20:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Keith Akers
An article that you have been involved in editing, Keith Akers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. +Angr 21:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

christian anarchism / free society
Hi Nirvana2013. You recently added the "christian anarchism" category to Free Society. In general, categories should not be added to articles unless they are defining attributes of the subject of the article, and as such they should feature prominently in the article itself. See WP:CAT. The article on Free Society doesn't mention Christian anarchism at all, which is because I largely drafted the article and am unaware of any such leanings. Do you have some cites to justify the category, and to write some information about it in the article? Otherwise, we should remove the category until and unless the article can be revise to justify its inclusion. I've posted about this on Talk:Free Society, so please respond there. --Lquilter (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Revelations for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Revelations, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Revelations until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of SPDR Gold Shares for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article SPDR Gold Shares, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SPDR Gold Shares until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Veriss (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Reply from my talk page. Thought it was odd looking.  Perhaps if you want the redirect to stay, you should remove that content and post that you would like to keep the redirect to that other article.  Perhaps explain in the talk page as well.  It's not on speedy delete so you have tons of time.  Sounds reasonable to me.  Cheers, Veriss (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your edit to my book
Thanks I appreciate your edit to Book:Radical Christianity. It appears that we have some of the same interests, so if you ever want some help collaborating on an article, please let me know. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Fruitarianism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Tolstoyan/ism
Re this edit: if you are proposing a page move, please get consensus first at talk:Tolstoyan. When the move is agreed, use db-move to request it. &mdash; RHaworth 12:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Muscular Christianity
Hi. I'm curious about why you linked to Pauline Christianity from Muscular Christianity. Is there some element of Paul's teachings that we can point to specifically? &mdash;JerryFriedman (Talk) 16:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I think that improves the article. &mdash;JerryFriedman (Talk) 22:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

James Eric Davidson
Hi there. You contributed to this article back in 2007; I have recently nominated it for deletion. If you're interested, your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/James Eric Davidson (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Christian Anarchism GA review
See Talk:Christian anarchism/GA1 the article needs some work. If you can address the issue in a reasonable Time frame I will review it again. If you have any questions let me know. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 14:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Forks Over Knives
The "Over" in this film is properly capitalized. See, e.g., IMDb, official site, etc., etc. See also, e.g., One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (various book, film, play, etc.). I'm not sure what rule you think you're applying, but it's not correct in this case. Robert K S (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment de chrétien je suis devenu anarchiste
You seem to have used this title to add a number of pages to the Christian Anarchist category. As far as I can tell the title has the sense of "How I went from being a Christian to being an Anarchist," which is rather different from the translation you are using. Libertatia (talk) 00:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks Libertatia, I have removed the references. Nirvana2013 (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello There
Hi,

Want to have a look at Talk:Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi and subsequent discussion? If convenient, could you please mention your views too? ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर &#124; असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म..  Humour Thisthat2011  18:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Steiner
I was surprised by the addition of a link to Jesuism from Steiner's biography -- is there a connection? I'm afraid that I've removed the link for the moment until evidence of a relationship is provided -- maybe I'm missing something here, though? hgilbert (talk) 12, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Image
why did you remove the image from christian anarchism and anarchism and religion? It is regarded as a key text in christian anarchism. --124.181.125.226 (talk) 00:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Subtle distinctions about taxes
Unless I am reading the history wrong, it looks as though you are the one who took out some technical distinctions at Corvée and put in some over-general assertions instead. I have tried to replace them while respecting your own contribution as much as possible, but I thought I should clarify my version too, to let you know how and why I did what I did.

You can't "pay" a tax in kind; that's a matter of definition, tautologously true. If you win a prize, say a thousand tins of dog food, you may get assessed income tax on it - but you won't get away with offering 30% of the tins, or with arguing that you don't owe cash since you didn't win cash. You will be assessed "deemed" cash earnings, and have to pay in cash - and tough if you haven't got the cash flow to do it.

So, payments in kind aren't - technically, formally - taxes. Tithes are also not taxes since they are not owed to governments. You might think these are quibbles, but on the one hand these distinctions matter in articles that cover technical matters, and on the other hand they keep coming up and making a difference even in the modern world (a farm at Aston Cantlow was assessed in that way to pay a church, and the case confirmed that this was not a tax).

So, what about Corvée? It's not a tax, in the precise sense, though it is closely connected, and that connection should be noted. But it is not an obligation to pay cash, and it is most definitely not something that is always imposed by states. You can get them owed to others - like feudal lords - and you can "pay" them by working them off (in fact, sometimes you can't pay them off in cash, as that commutation option may not be on offer). PMLawrence (talk) 09:21, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Further to your comments on my talk page, I also take your own point. However, the "is it a tax?" question should really speak for itself, the court case(s) I mentioned really did confirm that dues to a church are not taxes, and the Madagascar material I put in the Corvée article some time ago really did make the distinction between labour obligations and tax obligations as seen from a colonialist perspective - and I did provide that reference when someone challenged about that on that occasion. So, just how is my position not backed by citations? We can't repeat citations in detail at every level of summary. I see that the Aston Cantlow article doesn't bring out the glebe law case at the moment, but now that I have told you about it you can research it and word any citation to suit yourself.

By the way, thank you for not just jumping in and reverting automatically, the way I have seen some people approach things. PMLawrence (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OmniPay


A tag has been placed on OmniPay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGaw (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of OmniPay


The article OmniPay has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGaw (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited History of veganism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim Merkel (author)


The article Jim Merkel (author) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Merkel (author)


A tag has been placed on Jim Merkel (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heidemarie Schwermer


A tag has been placed on Heidemarie Schwermer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 05:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications
Hey there. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links on the page), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   22:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gandhimovie.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Gandhimovie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia &bull; It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom &bull; To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism