User talk:Nirvanaoreilly

Moving pages
Welcome to Wikipedia, please do not move articles such as 2021 United States presidential inauguration without consensus and especially controversial political articles, which are subject to arbcom restrictions. Biden has not been declared the winner yet. Praxidicae (talk) 14:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello User:Praxidicae, apologies for the jump. Should we wait until Associated Press makes the official call? I noticed Biden's Wikipedia page had been updated to say he is the president-elect. 14:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I would say wait until it's truly official whether it's by AP or a concession (even though that seems increasingly unlikely on Trump's part.) Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

MOS:SMALLFONT
Please read MOS:SMALLFONT. Infoboxes reduce font size to less than 100% by default, and making it even smaller violates MOS:ACCESS. Avoid using smaller font sizes within elements that already use a smaller font size, such as infoboxes, navboxes, and reference sections. This means that  tags, and templates such as and, should not be applied to plain text within those elements. In no case should the resulting font size of any text drop below 85% of the page's default font size (i.e. 11.9 px in Vector skin or 10.8 px in Monobook). Note that the HTML  tag has a semantic meaning of fine print; it is not used for stylistic changes. The other pages are wrong and I intend to fix them over time. There is also no reason to spell out the entire names of these people, which goes against WP:COMMONNAME. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Muboshgu, I do apologize for the misunderstanding, and thank you for the clarification. Nirvanaoreilly (talk) 01:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inauguration of Joe Biden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second impeachment of Donald Trump (January 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Second impeachment of Donald Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Second impeachment of Donald Trump, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eyebeller&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Second_impeachment_of_Donald_Trump reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 17:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inauguration of Joe Biden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Build Back Better.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank for doing the viewership numbers. I was about to do them, when I noticed they had already been done. Good work. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Nirvanaoreilly (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inauguration of Joe Biden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

"Second impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Second impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SecretName101 (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muskogee home shooting


The article Muskogee home shooting has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication that this is a notable event, seems like standard reporting of this sort of thing."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  21:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Murder of Kevin Jiang


A tag has been placed on Murder of Kevin Jiang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – S. Rich (talk) 01:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Kevin Jiang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Kevin Jiang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Kevin Jiang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mass shootings in the United States in 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations


The article Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "There does not appear to be enough reporting or verifiable information behind these reports as of yet. That could change but it does not appear to meet that threshold as of now."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matt Gaetz sexual misconduct allegations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- Possibly (talk) 04:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi. Would you mind using edit summaries in future? It's standard practice. I ask because in the Matt Gaetz article above there are over a dozen edits with no summary, so it is hard to see what is going on without examining each edit.--- Possibly (talk) 17:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Possibly, apologies, and yes, I will. I sometimes get caught up in the edits. Also, about the AfD, I do not have comment, but completely respect the decision of the more experienced editors like yourself. Nirvanaoreilly (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. For an article like that one, I think it's important to remember we are not news (we strive to be far behind the news in some ways), and to consider the WP:BLP advice of being extremely prudent. This bizarre Gaetz story could go any number of ways in the coming months, and an article is likely only appropriate when it's required because it would overwhelm the main article, and also because the facts are known. At the moment, too many of the facts are unknown or speculative, and could go in many directions.--- Possibly (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * re 2021 Orange, California office shooting, are you familiar with WP:NOTNEWS?--- Possibly (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Joe Biden speech to a joint session of Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

"2025 United States presidential inauguration" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2025 United States presidential inauguration. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ― Tartan357  Talk 22:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting into Sandy Hook Memorial. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2021 Muskogee shooting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Muskogee shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2021 Muskogee shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 01:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of events commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of events commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the September 11 attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. —Panamitsu (talk) 22:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)