User talk:Nirvash0770

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Belt (clothing) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  00:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollows in Bleach. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Hollows in Bleach was changed by Nirvash0770 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952086 on 2011-06-09T21:05:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pregnant spiders


A tag has been placed on Pregnant spiders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lelouch Lamperouge, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lelouch Lamperouge was changed by Nirvash0770 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958063 on 2011-06-26T23:53:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:53, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Code Geass characters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Code Geass characters was changed by Nirvash0770 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914167 on 2011-06-26T23:58:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mathonius (talk) 23:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winge


The article Winge has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unencyclopedic content - WP:DICTIONARY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Winge
I am more than willing to ignore your previous warnings and assume good faith, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary (see WP:DICTIONARY) and therefore your page cannot be included in Wikipedia. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Winge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Winge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)