User talk:Nisf

Welcome!
Hello, Nisf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 115ash →(☏) 15:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Teen Dramas
No probs. Thanks. Hcns (talk) 03:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits on List of defunct retailers of the United States
I have noticed that you had recently added Original research and Essay-like templates to List of defunct retailers of the United States. Since you appear to be conscientious editor, it would be nice if you are able to point out the particular problems with this particular list that prompted you to add those templates since it is very difficult to fix something something if no one is able to figure out what the particular problem is. The best place for you to point out these problems is to bring the topic up on that list's Talk Page.

Is your main concern is the "preface" that appeared to have popped up just a year ago? (This edit) If so, I would be happy to revert the additions that were made in 2014 since I am not crazy about it myself.

If you are unable to point out the particular parts that could use some improvements, I might revert you edit and label your edit as another case of "drive-by tagging" since those incidents would never lead to any constructive improvements because no one would be able to discover the exact problem that requires fixing. 107.216.165.224 (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply and for your addition to Talk:List of defunct retailers of the United States since there is now a record of your objections now which would allow me to make a large deletion without starting a nonproductve WP:EDITWAR. 107.216.165.224 (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of teen dramas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stand Up!. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Police of The Wire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Due Respect ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Police_of_The_Wire check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Police_of_The_Wire?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of teen dramas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V Live ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_teen_dramas check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_teen_dramas?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nancy (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nancy_%28given_name%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nancy_%28given_name%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Moody ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ivan_%28name%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ivan_%28name%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strange Days at Blake Holsey High, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Strange_Days_at_Blake_Holsey_High check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Strange_Days_at_Blake_Holsey_High?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Tagged (web series)
I had forgotten that the third season was released on Hulu. I've made this edit in light of that to try to "bridge the gap" – it did begin as more of a true "web series" (in the original, traditional sense), but it did end its run as a "streaming series". Hopefully, this is a satisfactory resolution. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Hi, some of your recent edits, such as the one on the Elves and Open Your Eyes pages, are mildly disruptive. Please be more observant of existing style on any particular page, and in general, before proceeding to make changes to it. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HBO Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Showtime original programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Disney+ Original Series Template Page
The "Disney+ Original Series Template" page has always stuck to series that already have existing pages... and I understand that. However, I believe it is best if we include every original series that exist on the streaming service - regardless of page status (pages or no pages available). Just because, if we don't include them it causes a bit of confusion when people are looking for certain series under this section banner and cannot find them. Please allow us all to add ALL existing Disney+ original series in order to eliminate confusion. NO SERIES OR FILM TITLE SHOULD BE LEFT OUT. I think it is important and other editors like me agree.

Please, I ask that you stand with me on this decision. Others like user Oinkers42 are trying to prevent every title from being added due to non-existing page links.

I ask that all users stand with me on this decision, to change this template for the better. Thank you! --Mattsyman (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Policy on lists of TV series containing total episode counts vs. released episode counts
I used to be a very active maintainer of several lists of TV series (particularly List of Apple TV+ original programming), but I have been far less active over the past year, which is why I'm asking this question now. Previously, we would update the episode counts in this list each week so that it only contained the count of released episodes (as was done in the individual show articles). I'm assuming there must have been a policy change, but a brief search didn't reveal anything. If you wouldn't mind directing me towards when this change was made, that would be much appreciated.

If this is the new policy, does it also apply to episode counts on individual show articles as well? Also, what are the guidelines around what season and episode is used. For instance, if a show has 2 10-episode seasons ordered, but the first season has aired 6 episodes, do we list 2 seasons, 20 episodes, or 1 season, 10 episodes?

Thanks for clarifying, as regardless of the specific rule, it is not being consistently followed within List of Apple TV+ original programming, and I would like to fix it. Rmaloney3 (talk) 18:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there, it seems to be not so much a policy/rule as status quo, apparently - I've tried updating other streaming programming pages to only show aired episodes in the tables, only to have the changes reverted and be told that that wasn't the case. To be honest, it seems worth it to bring up as a discussion item with WP:TV to gain some consensus on what the practice should be. Currently the precedent seems to be "current season + number of episodes ordered for the current season" on the streaming programming lists.
 * On the other hand, there is definitely clear guidance on the individual show articles, as the TV infobox clearly states that the number of episodes should be incremented only as they're aired. Nisf (talk) 23:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Red Rose (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you..--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I opened a Talk section for you on 24 August 2022. You have again deleted my input with the same obtuse edit summary (which does acknowledge your earlier deletion). You can explain why you are deleting at Talk:Red Rose (TV series), per WP:BRD.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I did not see the discussion on the talk page initially - I do not follow the page, so I did not get an alert when the discussion was opened. I explained my actions there. Nisf (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Comment
While I think I understand where you are going, the criteria for both lists is apparently flawed and capricious, insofar original series billed as platforms originals released in said platform in its primary market would not feature in the list. Do as you wish, anyways, I am afraid that both lists are going to remain whimsical either way unless a major re-structuring is undertaken. Suffice to say that I am not interested in contributing to capricious lists.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Asqueladd, to clear up any confusion: it's not the release area that determines whether a show is on List of Disney+ original programming, and sorry if my comment implied that it was. Although the advertising is showing La última premiering on Disney+ in Europe, it is actually premiering on the Star content hub within the Disney+ service in regions where Hulu and Star+ are not available. These are separate from Disney+ Originals. Hope this helps. Nisf (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Reverts
I noticed that you reverted a number of my edits, like the one on List of Amazon Prime Video original programming. I might be wrong, but is that article referring to a tv-channels/bunch of tv-channels or is it a production company? To my opinion, it is the first, so WP:NOTTVGUIDE, a policy, applies. The Banner talk 16:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @The Banner: 1) It's both - hence the name Original programming. 2) The second portion of that policy says "...although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable." As it seems like there is disagreement over the interpretation of this policy (the section seems to be primarily discouraging programming schedules in the style of TV Guide), I suggest discussion and consensus in an appropriate outlet, such as the talk pages of the articles in question or at WP:TELEVISION. Thank you! Nisf (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * And it starts with "An article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events (...)". A section about upcoming programs is clearly about "upcoming events" and thus not allowed. The part you mentioned is, to my opinion, not talking about future programming. The Banner  talk 16:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @The Banner I disagree - again, the policy is to prevent the publishing of time/date programming guides, and doesn't define what an "event" is (Does it need to have the date and time? Is it all upcoming shows, or only those not produced by the company? Why a section about upcoming TV series treated differently than one about upcoming films? These are all questions that can be addressed via discussion with WP:TELEVISION) Again, I suggest reaching WP:CONSENSUS as there are many who interpret the rule similarly, as Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. Nisf (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There is also an issue called spam and advertising... The Banner  talk 17:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @The Banner: All entries are sourced by WP:RELIABLE third-party journalistic websites - I can only speak for myself, but I have no personal connection to the television business, I am simply a hobbyist editor. Regardless, my personal talk page is no longer the best place to discuss the removal of this section any further – I have simply stated that such an action should be discussed via WP:CONSENSUS, as agreement on the interpretation of the section is not unanimous. I have provided several venues to do so - you may want to engage in further discussion there. Nisf (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I have opened a discussion on the talk page of WP:NOT, proposing a text change: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. The Banner  talk 18:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carpool Karaoke: The Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bacon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Disney+ Originals edit for January 19
Hi, I would like to address a recent edit you made on the Disney+ Original series wikipedia page.

Despite La Ultima being available on Hulu, internationally it is branded as a STAR Original within Disney+. STAR is a hub within Disney+ home to many STAR Originals. Typically, when STAR originals premiere on Disney+ in the US, they are billed as Disney+ originals, but when they aren't they are still technically considered originals since they ORIGINALLY premiered on the Disney+ streaming service globally, not Hulu. I would really appreciate it if you could find a new home for this title on the Disney+ Original series wikipedia page.

Thank you. Mattsyman (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * It's already on List of Hulu original programming as a Hulu Original, on List of Star+ original programming, and on List of Star (Disney+) original programming. It does belong on List of Disney+ original programming because it is neither branded as a Disney+ Original nor is it exclusively on the Disney+ hub in any region. Nisf (talk) 20:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Anime Hulu programming
Don't ubl format the networks for the anime section, its unnecessary and beefs up the table length for no good reason and I can't seem to find why on earth you're so insistent on reverting that. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

ABC pics
There was a method to my madness regarding the pics

You have to have a little bit of everything represented on ABC's plate...news, sports, daytime, primetime, sitcoms, drama, reality.

Muir is the evening news anchor...he's gotta be there, given the longevity and popularity of The View, that needed representation, Herbstreit represent sports, as Saturday Night Football - which Herbstreit has been on since day 1 - has been a mainstay on ABC for nearly 20 years.

The way it was before was just random...pics for the sake of pics of who people like the best. My version wanted to strike a balance, and I hold that same philosophy for NBC, CBS, and Fox, which is why I set those pics up the same way over on those pages.

Perhaps I could have explained it better before, but that is the logic for what I did. Vjmlhds (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! By talk page I meant the talk page for List of programs broadcast by ABC (American TV network) – I reverted your changes because you undid a bunch of formatting changes related to the references section that had nothing to do with the pictures. I have zero opinions related to the photos on the page – it was another user who reverted your selection of photos. If you want to add the photos back you should do it manually (so as not to undo the other formatting changes), or discuss with the other editors on the page's talk page. Nisf (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I redid the pics in a way that didn't affect the other stuff...that was unintentional tunnel vision on my part, and I apologize for that. Vjmlhds (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries! Nisf (talk) 15:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

User vandalizing Saturdays page
Hi! Do you know what we do about users who vandalize pages?

This one user will not stop vandalizing and messing with the Saturdays (TV series) page and it's getting out of hand.

Is there a way to block someone from a specific page?!

Thanks. Cqntralls (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

MOS:TABLECAPTION
See MOS:TABLECAPTION! Thanks, Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 17:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

WP:CRYSTALBALL
Ok I see what you mean now in regards to the WP, it wasn't WP abuse, I'm sorry about that rvt. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)


 * On the other hand, what I typed wasn't necessarily a violation of that WP since the citation is there proving it is returning to Adult Swim for a 3rd season. I'm simply implying I understood why you thought it could be used that way, I just think it wasn't necessary for the context. That is all.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 02:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi there, to clarify, there is a difference between "will premiere" and "is scheduled to premiere". Per WP:CRYSTALBALL: "Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even otherwise-notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident." We do the same thing on all the other programming pages – everything in the future is "scheduled" until it actually premieres, as there are several instances where a TV program does not premiere as announced/scheduled. Nisf (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, English WP is getting way too technical with its terminology here. Regardless of anything else, once Toonami has announced a line up I've never seen them change it in the entirety of its Adult Swim era. You didn't have to clarify btw, that was the entire point of this message. No hard feelings!--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 01:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi Nisf! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Aaron Liu (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Sullivan's Crossing
The CW has agreed to air the second season. While this may have helped the show's chances for renewal, The CW is not listed as a producer: "It is produced by Reel World Management in association with CTV with Fremantle as global distributor."

Broadcasting is not equivalent to production. Unless you find a source explicitly saying CW is producing it too, please do not add it back as a "co-production". That's an unsourced edit. Linkin Prankster (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see my note on my most recent edit. Per the same article, "As partners for season two, we cannot wait to work alongside this talented cast and excellent creative team to deliver another emotionally captivating season." Additionally, by your logic, NONE of the shows on the page should be listed as The CW Originals, as The CW is not listed as a producer for any of its shows. Nisf (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, take it to the network's talk page, not my personal page. Nisf (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Forget it, I was wrong. Btw CW is listed as a producer for Joan and Son of a Critch in sources. Linkin Prankster (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Moves
Hi. I took care of your request at WP:RM/TR, but just want to let you know, in case you don't already, that you should be able to do these kinds of moves yourself. As long as there is not more than one edit at the redirect that points back to the article to be moved, any autoconfirmed editor should be able to move that article over the redirect. Station1 (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Streaming television series in India
This term is rarely used in India, where people prefer to use the terms "web series" and "OTT" instead of "streaming". That is why I put streaming television series in most of these articles as viewers frequently change them to "web series". They believe "television series" is erroneous, and refers only to broadcast television. , do you agree? Kailash29792 (talk)  12:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree but imo nobody in India says streaming television in a day-to-day conversation. DareshMohan (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Great Expectations (upcoming series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Expectations_(upcoming_series)&redirect=no Great Expectations (upcoming series)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Tubi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extraterrestrial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

In the Know
Thank you. I see it now. I looked and looked, but apparently not in the right place.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  17:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Peacock original programming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Traitors.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  The Grand Delusion (Send a message) 03:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Removal of red link
Regarding this edit, please note that our WP:REDLINK editing guideline states:
 * Add red links to articles to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable. Red links help Wikipedia grow.[ 1] The creation of red links prevents new pages from being orphaned from the start.[ 2] Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished.

--Lambiam 18:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Apple TV+
The sheer fact these articles are in mainspace corroborates their filming, what are you doing? Rusted AutoParts 18:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * You cannot use Wikipedia as a source for filming, per WP:NOTSOURCE. Anyone can make an article in the mainspace for a television show regardless of its status. Nisf (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * They are literally on their pages, one simple look proves this.
 * The Savant
 * Your Friends and Neighbors
 * I do not move pages for shows or films into mainspace unless they are reliably sourced to be filming. These reverts you're making are so frustratingly pointless. Please restore my edits. Rusted AutoParts  18:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It's equally confusing given we've been collaborating on this page since September 2021 and at no point since then did you take any exception with the way I shifted around the programming when their production status changed. This is just baffling and a needless conflict. Rusted AutoParts  18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand (it's not that I don't trust you), but sourced information SHOULD be the standard - I've requested the same on other streaming pages when other less experienced users have changed the status of upcoming shows based on guesswork. Nisf (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Re: List of Star+ original programming
You may be unaware that, pursuant to a lengthy RfC on the subject, titling policy has changed to require that season articles not use parentheses around seasons of television shows. Pursuant to this, the community has renamed all of the thousands of articles responsive to this new requirement. Therefore, The Walking Dead season 11 and The Orville season 3 are now the correct titles of these articles. Please restore these direct links that you have reverted on List of Star+ original programming. BD2412 T 15:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello @BD2412, apologies, I did not realize you had changed the article links, as you had also changed the season name on other pages when it was in ubl format when it was not a wikilink. Changing the links back now.Nisf (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Nist, thanks - cheers! BD2412  T 14:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Tokyo Revengers Season 3 hiccups
Despite the earlier mentioned was corrected as Season 3, Disney+ & Hulu has glued Season 3 into the second season listings. VernardoLau (talk) 19:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Web series
Hi,

About the removal of web series decsriptions and categories by you. If these are not web series and you are removing cats pertaining to the same, it is expected that you replace them with the apt television cats.

I have done this for some of them, please do the same for the rest. Gotitbro (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Not a problem - most of the series already have all relevant cats already included, but understand where there may be a deficiency. Nisf (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Century City (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genetic profiling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Creature Comforts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Chasing Nature
 * added a link pointing to Talon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Nisf. Thank you for your work on List of National Geographic original features. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, thanks for the comment. I was unaware of the List of National Geographic documentary films when I created the page. I am working on fixing the page List of National Geographic original programming and spun off the feature content on that page onto a separate page (I copied and pasted the unchanged content as it was on the original page). Since the films page exists, I am fine with deleting the redundant page. Sorry about that! Nisf (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. When you WP:SPLIT a page, please make sure to provide attribution, see Copying within Wikipedia. You can do so by adding a dummy edit with an edit summary similar to Content fork from List of National Geographic original programming; see its page history for attribution.
 * Regarding deletion: I think what would make the most sense here would be a WP:MERGE of the two lists, what do you think? Broc (talk) 12:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Broc Thank you, was unaware of the guideline! And yes, would recommend a WP:MERGE for the two pages. Nisf (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Uncalled for comments
Please do not vandalise my page again without cause. All I said was unsourced didn’t insult anyone or say rude things. If u can point to what I said that is unconstructive please do otherwise I’ll consider what you are doing as pure bias Fishytimes196 (talk) 17:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Explaining why I reverted your edits isn't vandalism. I have already explained why your edits were unconstructive, and you have come back with threats to report. You have also name-called other editors on the site. Any further antagonism is unnecessary. Nisf (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You have not if you please explain what I have done I will understand and correct my behaviour and what names help me honestly so I can correct such errors in judgement Fishytimes196 (talk) 17:56, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If you’re unwilling to be reasonable then I see no other reason to be on here anymore I’ll just quit Wikipedia all together Fishytimes196 (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the comments left on the history of edits at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney%2B_original_programming&action=history for more information on why your edits were disruptive. Nisf (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Quoting my comments. Just for reference.
 * “ It hasn't been 3 years yet”
 * ”unsourced”
 * “No updates have been given the show for more than 3 years”
 * “Unsourced unless there is a legitimate source like deadline or marvel itself which confirms such rumours”
 * ” 3 years and has not been made and on top do that it’s been cancelled since 2022”
 * “More than 3 years without any movement”
 * well I have checked it and even went so far as to look on hbo max programing and haven’t found a comment that is considered rude and insulting. But if that’s how you look at any comment then to each they’re own as I always say, I’m gonna choose to not entertain you anymore I’m gonna do my own thing u can do as you wish and best of luck to u Fishytimes196 (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh and just for reference please look through this Special:Contributions/Fishytimes196 I have nothing I am ashamed to present so please look through and honestly I mean this whole u heartedly if u do find u see as dodgy please do talk to me about it and I’ll research it myself and if you’re right I’ll apologise for any actions of mine thank u Fishytimes196 (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Chaotic Enby  (talk · contribs) 18:46, 17 July 2024 (UTC)