User talk:Nishant 91919

Speedy deletion of Aarushi Talwar
A tag has been placed on Aarushi Talwar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. In reference to the above, while this crime may be notable, proper sourcing is essential to all articles, but especially those that allege criminal behavior on the part of a living person. See our guideline for information in articles about living persons. While obviously the subject of this article is no longer living, accusations against anyone in connection to the crime must be properly sourced to reliable, secondary sources. In terms of the general advisability of the article, articles are rarely created on Wikipedia in the names of crime victims, as these individuals are notable only for one event. Occasionally, if a crime has particularly far-reaching aspects, exceptions are made. Generally, an article about the crime would be under the name of the convicted perpetrator or under a name suggestive of the crime (take Murder of Adam Walsh for instance), and, again, generally only if the crime has long-term notability. Unfortunately, murders are a common enough occurrence in this world that the fact of the murder itself is not regarded as inherently notable. :/ Element that might add special notability might include legal impact (for instance Megan's Law) or the raising of unique questions about the nature of the crime, like the Megan Meier suicide controversy. Thanks for your contribution. If you have any questions about these policies or about using Wikipedia in general, please feel free to let me know at my talk page or to seek assistance at Wikipedia's help desk, typically manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)