User talk:Nishchal.kumar

September 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Marwari horse was changed by Nishchal.kumar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857308 on 2012-09-24T11:51:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Kathiawari
Hi Nishchal - Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, I have had to revert your changes to Kathiawari, because you removed links and sourced content without explanation. You need to provide more of an explanation than "deleting...false descriptions" when removing sourced information - preferably providing this explanation on the talk page. If you have sources that say there is no Mongolian blood in the Kathiawari, please provide them. Dana boomer (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Marwari horse
Hello again Nishchal - Unfortunately, I am here again to ask you to stop your edits to the Marwari horse article. You cannot just delete information without explanation. From the Marwari article, you removed a significant amount of information on the history of the breed, the formation of the breed association and studbook, and the genetic testing that has been done on the Marwari and other Indian breeds - all without explanation. Please discuss your intended changes on the article's talk page - Talk:Marwari horse. If you continue to remove or change sourced information, your editing privileges may be revoked. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Nishchal, I want to add to Dana's comments that we have to have reliable sources for wikipedia; that means material that is published in a third-party publication, not simply the expertise of an individual wikipedia editor or his/her self-published research or other work. So when you disagree about material, you have to PROVE your points by providing proper sources that everyone else can also examine, and it's best to discuss these matters on the article talk page rather than just diving into an article and changing it.   Montanabw (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)