User talk:Nishesh99

June 2020
Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mount Everest without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JimRenge (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gautama Buddha, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  18:35, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lumbini. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  18:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gautama Buddha, you may be blocked from editing. JimRenge (talk) 18:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gautama Buddha. JimRenge (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 18:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * You aren't blocked simply because of your latest Mt Everest incident, you are blocked because it was the latest in a series of edits pushing a Nepalese pov without justification or sources. If you are happy to avoid anything involving Nepal, ie a topic ban on such pages, I see no reason why you can't be unblocked, but you'll need also to agree to try to find reliable sources for any future edits in other areas. Follow the instructions in the block template above. Doug Weller  talk 09:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)