User talk:Niteshshahlaxminiya

Speedy deletion nomination of Nitesh Computer and Mobile Repairing centre


A tag has been placed on Nitesh Computer and Mobile Repairing centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Tagishsimon (talk) 05:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

COI
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nitesh Computer and Mobile Repairing Centre


A tag has been placed on Nitesh Computer and Mobile Repairing Centre, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Pinging . Cabayi (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * , spamming continues despite your warnings below, indeffed as WP:Not here, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Majhare. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Laxminiya Bazzar, you may be blocked from editing. Another attempt to publicise your business. Cabayi (talk) 10:08, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pokhariya, Kosi. And yet another insertion of your name. Cabayi (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 14:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 07:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * As stated in the UTRS appeal, above, this is a self-admitted compromised account. Just Chilling (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just Chilling,, if these were talk page unblock requests, editing would probably have been revoked now, either as a compromised account, if you believe that, or as tendentious and merit-less multiple appeals. Can users just keep submitting UTRS appeals indefinitely? I've not been involved in the process other than to read outcomes, so just a seeker after knowledge, and as the blocking admin I've no intention of interfering with the unblock process myself, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No, UTRS access can be revoked too if an editor makes too many inadequate requests. I declined the latest appeal simply because talk page access is still enabled here, and I suspect we have a communication problem. I did ponder asking for UTRS access to be revoked, but I thought I'd give them one last chance - but I have no problem if someone else wants to do that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Except where there are privacy issues, we redirect UTRS appeals to the talk page until TPA has been revoked. I often remove UTRS access for a month when the applicant refuses to use TP to encourage them on there. When TPA has been revoked we take 2-4 UTRS appeals before that facility is removed. Just Chilling (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)