User talk:Nithin

__INDEX__



Stub templates
Please do not add stub to an article like USS California (SSN-781) which already has a specific stub template: it just wastes other editors' time. Please note that all stub templates go at the bottom of the article, not the top - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. Pam D  20:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I notice you did the same here. Pam  D  20:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry --Nithin (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Also, please don't add stub templates to articles rated above stub-level. Thank you.&mdash; CycloneIsaac ( Talk ) 19:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

When did i do That?--Nithin (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

=Legality of cannabis= Hey Nithin, I did a mistake. You see, I'm new to editing here in wikipedia. What happened is that legalization of Mexico was approved just one week ago, so I made the changes but forgot to delete the previous information and to write it down. Sorry for the inconvenience

University Of Chittagong
Can I please know, why did you remove my added information? A simple human2222 (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Systemic bias Nithin! (talk) 05:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Nithin. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANithin enabled] rollback on your account&#32;until 2019-05-28. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

May 2019
I read your comment on my page (with the title I'm using here). I had just seen the film (John Wick 3) and thought the description on the wiki was inaccurate, but I don't intend to get in an edit war over it. I expect when more people see it someone else will correct the description. This IP address isn't the same one I've used to make other edits here, and if it changes again I may miss further comments from you, which is all the more reason not to have an extended back-and-forth. 207.237.196.98 (talk) 04:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks for that, the phrasing of it seemed suspicious at first. go ahead and make the change, In the summary link this conversation (to prevent accusations of edit warring)

Rollback granted
Hi Nithin. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ANithin enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

revision on functional medicine
Hello,

If you look back at the edit history of the page, you can see that I was not the only (nor first) person to think that the current version is incredibly biased. They use the words "so-called" to describe a chronic illness-- regardless of whether this has been proven, there is no need to use such pejorative (and, frankly, not objective) language. In addition, I added information about the NIH's National Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, which is arguable the most "objective" medical organization in the United States. I don't understand why this information would have been deleted while you kept information sourced mainly from a doctor who uses the extremely outdated term "quackery" to describe institutes at well-establish clinics (i.e. Cleveland Clinic and George Washington University Clinic). You may not agree with the concept of functional medicine, but it is dangerous to spew false and biased medical information.

132.162.95.60 (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)d


 * Thanks for letting me know, also the page has recently been protected to autoconfirmed. I suggest you discuss all the major changes on the talk pages before you make them.
 * Thanks! Nithin! (talk)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Chetsford (talk) 20:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

February 2020
Hello, I'm Nithin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nazi book burnings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Nithin! talk 02:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Spam
Please note that in this edit, you restored spam that an anonymous editor removed. Not a big deal, I know you were editing in good faith, just thought to note it. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. I'm using huggle and it can get difficult to make sure you are looking at the right version of a page! Thanks Nithin! talk 21:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Was this a mistake?
This edit is not a minor edit. It restores some material that is contrary to the sources, and even adds hostile editorializing against one ("Buzzfeed is not a reliable neutral news source however"). Please revert this. FollowTheSources (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * link me a reliable source that says he is a "a right-wing activistan American who associated himself with the 3 Percenters, a far-right paramilitary militia group, and set up web sites for other far-right organizations." the daily beast article thats cited certainly doesn't say that. Also if you looked at the edit, you would notice it was made in huggle, which marks everything as minor. Nithintalk 20:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The text cited https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-lockdown-boogaloo-protesters-now-have-a-21-year-old-martyr-in-duncan-lemp. Here are some relevant quotes:
 * In December, he posted a picture at some sort of military-style training and captioned it “III%”—an apparent reference to the far-right Three Percenter militia. On a militia forum, someone using a screen name Lemp frequently used described themselves as an “active III%er” eager to meet other members.
 * Lemp also set up websites for at least two far-right groups: the pro-gun “Virginia Knights” group and the “State of Appalachia,” a fledgling effort to create a new state from conservative portions of Virginia.
 * This is also supported by the another cited article: https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/lawyer-man-asleep-police-fired-house-killing-69587748. Relevant quotes include:
 * On social media accounts that friends said belonged to him, Lemp’s username was “YungQuant.” On an internet forum called “My Militia,” someone who identified himself as Duncan Lemp, of Potomac, and posted under the username “yungquant” said he was “an active III%'r and looking for local members & recruits.” That’s an apparent reference to the Three Percenters, a wing of the militia movement. The group’s logo, the Roman numeral “III,” has become popular with anti-government extremists, according to the Anti-Defamation League.
 * As for huggle, I'm sorry, I don't know what that is. Presumably, it's some sort of automated tool. If so, it's not being used correctly here, as the change is not minor.
 * Now that I've satisfied your good-faith request, please I'll go ahead and revert your change. FollowTheSources (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * after reading the abc article, i was inclined to revert my change. However, i looked at the article and it looks like you were wp:ew with user:68.134.94.58. i did appreciate how you decided to go with the adl's quote instead of doing your own analysis. It seems though like i will have to go in and just fix the article manually instead of just reverting because of all the different edits. I will add back what you had though. Also some backround on huggle it is a tool used to remove vandalism, which is what your edit was tagged as. Nithintalk 18:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I do try to live up to my name. FollowTheSources (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Username checks out Nithintalk 18:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And if you have ideas on how to improve the article further, go for it. FollowTheSources (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

List of Paramount Pictures (2020-2029)
I think you made a mistake. Some troller is making stuff up and clickbaiting everyone. For example, there's a reference of Demon Boy but it turns out it was just a clickbait for a Spice Girls movie. And Blade Runner sequel is really not happening right now. That guy is just being a total joke. They're not really real. So I think you should delete both of them because they're actually fakes and they're not really happening.
 * I will look into it, however, when explain your edits in the edit summary and dont leave cryptic unreadable messages in them either. Also after I did revert you change, which looked very much like vandalism, you immediately reverted my change. This further cemented the idea that it was vandalism. Also, sign your talk messages with four tildes (~ ~ ~ ~) Nithintalk 16:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

I know I'm sorry about that. I didn't know you revert it back already that fast.

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much! Nithintalk

D'oh!
Sorry for the edit in the List of Seas article (I'm just looking around for some random stuff), thanks for the notice and the warm welcome!

222.165.211.136 (talk) 02:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Annoying Annoying Template
Go to the talk page and engage in the discussion I started. You have not provided a substantial argument why the template is needed for this article. We are not here to engage in pettifoggery (rules for the sake of rules). Jehochman Talk 20:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry which article, which talk page?? Sorry I don't have immediate recognition of your username Nithin🚀 talk 21:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Honestly I don't appreciate you antagonizing me. I can understand having a discussion, but passive-aggressive comments, headers and antagonizing is unhelpful, uncalled for, and frankly childish. Nithin🚀 talk 21:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I should have mentioned Talk:GameStop short squeeze. Please weigh in. These are special circumstances because there's almost never a requested page move when a page is featured on the home page. If you think this an antagonizing, that makes me giggle, because you're the one who did the blind revert without even looking at my explanation or responding to it.  Now that's antagonizing. Jehochman Talk 21:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * "blind revert without even looking at my explanation or responding to it" did you look at my revert? "The template exists for a reason, to direct people and make them aware, and invite them to the conversation." this was directly responding to your template deletion "Join the discussion and let's see if there's a consensus to damage the encyclopedia with this annoying template. We are not bound to follow any rule that produces a stupid result.", generally create the discussion before deleting templates. Antagonizing is discounting the rational and logical reasons for the reversion. Antagonizing is belitelling me and minimizing my contributions and taking what I did out of context. Furthermore the header title was literally "annoying" so.... Nithin🚀 talk 21:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)