User talk:Nitindra Chandra Roy

September 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wellness—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Materialscientist Sir I am not an expert. I write to enjoy  it.Lack back link knowledge I have done.I apologize to you for that disturbance. Nitindra Chandra Roy (talk) 04:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Edits reverted
All your edits have been reverted as they were unconstructive and created work for others to clean up. Please see Help:Getting started and Short descriptions before you make any further edits. Uhai (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Maylingoed. An edit you recently made to Tulasi in Hinduism seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. mAyLiNgOeEd  (Talk to me!) (My contributions to Wikipedia📜)  16:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Maylingoed Thanks to you also,Sir.God bless you Nitindra Chandra Roy (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Project Chrono, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Please stop adding poor short descriptions to articles (e.g., by just copying or taking words randomly from the first sentence) and have a look at WP:SHORTDESC in its entirety before adding any further. Almost all of your short descriptions were not helpful and needed to be adjusted, resulting in work for other editors. Thank you.'' Felida97 (talk) 20:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Felida97 If I cannot remember where I have done it.Not intentionally Nitindra Chandra Roy (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.
 * Since my last warning you've added short descriptions that are just as bad as before, which is why it seems to me that you either did not read WP:SHORTDESC as I suggested or did not comprehend what is written there. For example, the short descriptions and  are clearly not in accordance with the very simple guidance given at WP:SDEXAMPLES, and the short descriptions  and  largely duplicate the articles' titles (see WP:SDDUPLICATE and WP:SDNONE).
 * Not only are most of your short descriptions riddled with grammatical and capitalization errors (e.g.,, or ), so that one can barely understand what you even meant to say, they are often factually incorrect or at least do not capture the topic of the article well (e.g., the article List of ambassadors of the United States to Vanuatu is not about the , in fact, the first sentence of that article reads "There is no embassy of the United States of America in Vanuatu."; your description  for Project Chrono, a physics engine, i.e. a piece of software; or , where you also managed to get both the name of the faculty and the name of the university wrong, for an individual institute associated with said faculty, the Centre of Mathematics and Design).
 * If you don't start following the guidance at WP:SHORTDESCRIPTION when adding short descriptions, you will be blocked eventually. If you're really not doing this intentionally and have read the linked pages, then I'm guessing you have quite a bit of trouble with the English language in general, which is totally fine, but in that case I would urge you to not add any further short descriptions until you improve those language skills. Otherwise, you're just wasting the time of other editors who have to clean up the vast majority of your edits (and your own time as well since most of your edits will have been reverted). This is not meant to discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope that you do contribute once you are able to contribute largely without language errors and have familiarized yourself with the policies and guidelines. Thank you! Felida97 (talk) 20:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 16:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @HJ Mitchell how can I do this. I am  sory for the past incident. But I can perform well.is there way out to learn ? Nitindra Chandra Roy (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)