User talk:Nitinvishway

August 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Sitar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey, @Adakiko! The edits I made were minor edits where I removed the content where it was likely more biased towards the East Asian, completely favoring it and while dismissing anything the from the Indian Scholars.
 * I would like to quote some lines from the article
 * "Even if modern musicological studies are taken into consideration, which have indicated that an origin linked to tambur-family instruments from West Asia is significantly more probable"
 * "The Indian origin theories haven't been examined and are questioned for representing obsolete 19th century ideas. The evidence for origin of sitar in chitra veena is too weak for any conclusion"
 * I hope you'll understand my view.
 * Thank you for giving me time. Nitinvishway (talk) 10:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I hope my changes will be reverted Nitinvishway (talk) 10:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * As the article says, the origins are disputed. That there is a dispute and has wp:reliable sources, the content probably should stay. If you think it should be removed, I would recommend starting a discussion on talk:Sitar. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. The issue may already have a discussion. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)