User talk:Nitish Kumar Singh09

May 2023
Hello Nitish Kumar Singh09. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nitish Kumar Singh09. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Team,
 * We are just trying to update our page with more accurate information. Please let me know how we should update our wiki page as information listed here are outdated. Nitish Kumar Singh09 (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/SonataSoftware ltd. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 15:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I am trying to edit some of the latest addition to our page. Not sure how do I proceed further. Can someone help me in updating the correct information please Nitish Kumar Singh09 (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Either you, or other people from your company, have repeatedly tried to add inappropriately promotional content to our article about your company. You have been repeatedly given links to our guidance on editing with a conflict of interest and to the paid editing requirements, but you have ignored them. I will make this as clear as I can: this is a volunteer project, we do not permit employees of organisations to dictate what our articles about those organanisations say. The article about your company belongs to us, not to you. You do not get to rewrite it so that it looks like an advert. Girth Summit  (blether)  14:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/SonataSoftware ltd. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)