User talk:Nitishkumartn

Welcome!

 * }

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pradhanmantri (TV Series) has been reverted. Your edit here to Pradhanmantri (TV Series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DJsaujUs3w, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yEIOU5-g-w) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Comedy Nights with Kapil
This week onwards one episode per week only. Image oriented for better presentation. Take necessary precaution to verify information before posting on portal.

Reverting back.

NOTE : PLEASE USE USER-TALK PAGE before reverting changes of any user as per wikipedia guidlines.

--GIZMOFY (talk) 08:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GIZMOFY (talk • contribs) 08:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bollywood Hundred Crore Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578069210 your edit] to Begusarai district may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Industry: Indian Oil Refinery- Barauni, Barani Thermal Power Station and hundreds of small industrial units in the private sector. A fertilizer plant in Barauni under

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578359707 your edit] to Bollywood Hundred Crore Club may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Crore Club''' consists films with over 100 crore net (after taxes) in India . http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-salman-shah-rukh-ranbir-bollywoods-rs-

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandeep Maheshwari


A tag has been placed on Sandeep Maheshwari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandeep Maheshwari


A tag has been placed on Sandeep Maheshwari, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mat ty. 007 15:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandeep Maheshwari


A tag has been placed on Sandeep Maheshwari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mat ty. 007 15:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandeep Maheshwari


A tag has been placed on Sandeep Maheshwari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Sandeep Maheshwari, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salma Sultan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shah Shuja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Edits to Gursharan Singh
Your addition to Gursharan Singh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jevansen (talk) 07:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nitesh-arpita.png


A tag has been placed on File:Nitesh-arpita.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jevansen (talk) 08:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Arpita-pandey.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Arpita-pandey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Blurred   Lines  14:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harsh-justajoo-Pallavi.png


A tag has been placed on File:Harsh-justajoo-Pallavi.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Blurred   Lines  14:39, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Your addition to Boss on 02:44 16 October 2013 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material from http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/moviemicro/criticreview/id/566663 to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Barauni Thermal Power Station
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Barauni Thermal Power Station, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Barauni_Thermal_Power_Station.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 04:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitesh Pandey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kumaon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Dasavala) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dasavala, Nitishkumartn!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"/"

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Aishwarya Menon
Please do not add this "See also" section in Aishwarya Menon's page without any good reason. None of the people listed under the section do seem to have anything common with Aishwarya (other than all of them being Malayalis but it makes no sense why these particular people are listed there). Also please see WP:EXT and WP:YT in particular and avoid adding Youtube links and Facebook profiles to the page. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Dadaidubey.png
Thank you for uploading File:Dadaidubey.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  SKATER  T a l k 20:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dadaidubey.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dadaidubey.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Mate doin' somethin wrong.
Nitish the way your making Bold edits is good. But adding bare URLs, spellings, unsourced additions along with unreliable ones if you add it makes our job immensely difficult. So please pay heed to the links I gave you above and above all you're adding copy-vio's without " " in the critical reception section. Please refrain from doing that. Ping me if you want anything or need help.  Sohambanerjee1998  07:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Reply of your question
(Hi Shivakumar, How you know all the ODI centuries of Sachin,that in which match he has scored which ODI century?)

Hi NitishKumar,

I know all details through www.espncricinfo.com, take the reference URL:

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/35320.html?class=2;template=results;type=allround;view=match — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivakumar.nm (talk • contribs) 06:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mickey Virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220  of  Borg 12:15, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mickey Virus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Zee TV Programmes
Hello, I'm Chanderforyou. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Zee TV Programmes because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! :- Chander  For  You'''  15:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krrish 3. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ''Addition of Unreliable sources including Bollywoodhungam.com and Koimoi. Not adhering to WP:NPOV.''  Sohambanerjee1998  05:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582040278 your edit] to Manoj Joshi (actor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * * Mr Joe B. Carvalho 2014 - Comissioner Pandey

Many of your edits
In case you didn't know, spaces are normally used with punctuation marks.


 * Instead of this:
 * I like bunnies(rabbits).They are not only cute,but friendly too.
 * Try this:
 * I like bunnies (rabbits). They are not only cute, but friendly too.

Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Reminder
Hi there. You stopped doing it for one or two edits. Now, you're back doing it again. Please, please, please, please, please, please, please pay attention to your spaces. If you don't, we have to go in there and fix up your mistakes. 

Thanking you in advance for your care and attention to spaces around punctuation,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Reminding you again
Hi again. You are still doing it. Really, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please pay attention to your spaces. I know it's a difficult habit to break, but please try. Around half of your edits need someone to go in and make the fixes. 

Thanking you in advance for your care and attention to spaces around punctuation,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Reminding you yet again
You are still doing it. Should I give up asking you to pay attention to this? I know you have a spacebar because you use it sometimes. I know you know how to use spaces because you've been reading English your whole life. I just don't understand. I really hope you can start using the spacebar or at least communicate with me here about it. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * [[File:Mediawiki-button-preview.png]] When you press this button it shows a preview by which you can view the article, the changes are not saved though, it prevents you from making a clutter of edits where only one can suffice. But remember to press the save button at the end!   Sohambanerjee1998   05:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Sachin centuries
Hi, please refrain from adding match nos. to the list. We don't follow that pattern in other lists. Since this is a WP:FL, we must to stick to one format which is followed in other similar lists. So please undo your edits. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  17:37, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

24-hour block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear Nitishkumartn,

Please don't be upset. This block is temporary. I'm very, very sorry to have had to block you. I'm just trying to get your attention so that we can communicate. I see that you've never edited your talk page, so I wasn't sure you were getting the messages. Please communicate with me.

This is about your lack of the use of the spacebar. See the thread above (User talk:Nitishkumartn).

I'm not sure you are even aware of the problem, but you are leaving behind a lot of mistakes that others have to go in and fix.

You are a productive editor and Wikipedia loves you for it. But please, please, could you please make sure to use the spacebar?

Many thanks, and again, sorry for the 24-hour block.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of international cricket centuries by Sachin Tendulkar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  11:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mr Joe B. Carvalho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabir Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MandanaIndoturkish.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:MandanaIndoturkish.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 19:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SharmilaFilmfarecover1968.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SharmilaFilmfarecover1968.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 19:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SharmilaaneveninginParis.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:SharmilaaneveninginParis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 19:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nitesh-wife-arpita.png


A tag has been placed on File:Nitesh-wife-arpita.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — howcheng  {chat} 19:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:MandanaStuffMagazine.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MandanaStuffMagazine.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — howcheng  {chat} 19:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Please do not upload any more images until you understand copyright violations. You cannot simply download an image from a random site, make edits to it, and claim that you are the owner. This is illegal and places Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation in legal jeopardy. — howcheng  {chat} 09:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Humadedhishqiya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Humadedhishqiya.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — howcheng  {chat} 17:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Anushkaladiesvricky.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Anushkaladiesvricky.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — howcheng  {chat} 17:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Repost of Austin Kincaid
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, I'm Anup. I have found a weird pattern of similarities between you and another editor recently blocked. Evidence: 1) Same set of choices of articles to edit. 2) Persistent copy-vio 3) Not using spacebar 4) Referencing style, 5) You came back to editing almost after a year following that user recent block and starting editing that user has left from.

If you are understanding what I'm talking about. I would like to let you know that, it'd be called sockpuppetry and an attempt to escape recent block. I'm not here to warn, but let you know that there's a discussion going on your other account's talk page (if that's really you). You may appeal to unblock yourself there with a promise to not repeat mistakes what you've been doing earlier. Following unblock you could link this account as an alternative account to your primary account. Regards, Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  19:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Shabnam Sayed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabnam Sayed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shabnam Sayed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CleanAmbassy (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Arpita Pandey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arpita Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arpita Pandey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kleuske (talk) 10:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)