User talk:Nitram0002

Revert Warrior
Martin, instead of spending all your energy making new identities, finding open proxies so that you can make "punishment edits" in order to be deliberately offensive to editors whose views you don't like, why don't you spend some of that energy actually attempting to engage with your enemies and evolve some kind of consensus - on the talk pages of the articles you edit would be a good start - and of course, as yet, you appear to have made no comment on the RfC about you whatsoever. Fits in with your pattern of ignoring consensus and just reverting to what you think is right - but seriously, it's a waste of everyone's time to act this way. PaulHammond 09:47, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Please do not edit user pages
Please do not edit others' user pages. Comments you have may be directed to the user's talk page. Also, I know that we all get a little angry from time to time, but I would request that you phrase your comments with more civility. This makes it easier to discuss the issues and work on building an encyclopedia. Thanks! &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 13:33, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Also, you (as Nitram0002 and Martin2000) have reverted Bahá'u'lláh three times in the past 24 hours. Reverting a fourth time may lead to a block. This would be a good time to take this to the talk page, where you can discuss this issue with other editors. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 13:46, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * I've blocked this sock. The userpage is now protected to keep the identification from being vandalized again. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 14:45, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)