User talk:Nitroglyn

Problems with upload of File:JoseEmmanuel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoseEmmanuel.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Emmanuelgalvan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuelgalvan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Emmanuel Jose Galvan"
A page you created, Emmanuel Jose Galvan, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Meph talk 07:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The main problems are notability and sourcing. The subject does not appear to meet the general notability guideline, the guideline for articles about people. Notability hinges upon verifiable information from reliable, third party sources unconnected with the subject.
 * "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published[1] non-trivial[2] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent,[3] and independent of the subject.[4] Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as the College Football Data Warehouse.
 * Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
 * Some sources must be used with particular care when establishing notability, and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Local sources must be clearly independent of the subject, and must provide a level of coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE. Listings of statistics must clearly satisfy the requirement for significant coverage."


 * For a biography of a living person, at least one reliable source must support something in the article. The subject's business or personal webpages are clearly not sufficient. neither of the two sources listed were suitable.


 * The article does not assert significance, let alone notability. I've brought here it rather than deleting it yet again because you said you are searching for sourcing. Please read the linked guidelines for more information. Generally, Google searching, newspaper searching are your best sources. A magazine or publiation from the subject's professional association might be accepted or not, as they may be held to not be independent. Hope this helps, Dloh cierekim  21:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Emmanuel Jose Galvan recreated though unimproved
Why have you recreated this in article space without improving it? It still makes no assertion of significance. It still gives no indication of the subject being notable. It still remains without reliable sourcing. Do you believe that the outcome will be any different? Why have you not engaged in any dialogue on the subject? Dloh cierekim  04:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emmanuel Jose Galvan


A tag has been placed on Emmanuel Jose Galvan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Dloh cierekim  04:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)