User talk:Nitsansh/Archive 3

Hi
I wish to tell you Orlando have not clinched. New Jersey can still beat them with a 47-35. Orlando can still finished 9th if they finish 46-36 and CLE, BOS, ORL, ATL, MIA, DET, PHI, CHI, NJN can finish at least 47-35. Syjytg (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't see New Jersey has more games remaining... Millwaukee has the same GB behind record and can only get to 45 wins, so I thought New Jersey also can't... and also Charlotte can get a tie with Orlando on 46 wins, so they should be taken in consideration as well... --Nitsansh (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

DG
DG means "decision game". Its service is to inform the reader that Anderlecht is not first and Standard not second, but that they are both first. Without DG most people would think that Anderlecht is first due to better goal difference. With DG people know there are more matches to be played to determine the champions. That is also why I didn't want to put any number for Anderlecht and Standard in last column of Round by round positions table. Anyway, the problem is that we cannot put both teams in the same row in league table and that's why the decision game needs to be denoted somehow. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I found nowhere in the article what's the meaning of DG. I meant that it should be explained.--Nitsansh (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Portal: Current events/Sports II
Do you have a fix suggestion for why the Current Events Box doesn't work? CLick on a day and it does not shortcut you to the day of the month. --Falcadore (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:Current sports at 2009 UEFA Women's Under-19 Championship
Just curious, was this a revert of my previous edit, or did you not notice it? In case it was the former, I'd ask you to read the guidelines of the template to be found at Template:Current sports. I don't think the article 2009 UEFA Women's Under-19 Championship requires a current event template currently. --Conti|✉ 15:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

User:TW-RF/Sandbox 5
Hello Nitsansh, I am going to be asking a couple of users to help on this in order to get this done because it is a big task that I can't get it done all on my own quickly! Just make sure to alert people before you start on a section by putting your signnature next to section number! Thanks!TW-RF (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

World Cup qualification, UEFA Group 2
The loser of the Greece-Latvia match (if it's not a draw) cannot win the group if Israel win their next match. Israel will be at 15 and Switzerland at 17 and those two teams play in the final match, so one of them has to get to 18. PiGuy314 (talk) 01:39, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Super League Playoffs
Hi Nitsansh. I have responded to your message on my talk page. Julianhall (talk) 10:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

2009 Super League season results
Hi again. I'm sure that your intentions were good, but Wikipedia isn't authorised to publish upcoming fixtures, only results. Therefore the entries that you've added have been hidden using HTML comments until the matches have been played. Julianhall (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

2009 Women's NORCECA Volleyball Championship
Dont you understand? We have a layout, please do not fix anything, all the previous championships have the same one. All NORCECA tournaments have the same, why dont you understand do not more changes. Period. Oscar987 21:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Tie-break rules in basketball
Can you give me the exact rules of this situation because I found this:

1) If 2 teams have the same record, the team that won the head to head game wins the tie breaker.

2) If there are more than 2 teams with the same record, then the tie breaker will be decided by the point difference in all games played. Please look at the chart below for an example. All 3 teams ended with 2 wins and 2 loses.

So in this example, Team C would win the tie breaker with +31, Team A will be second with -5, and Team B will be last with -9.

So, if this right, the standing in Euroleague 2009–10 is also correct.--KSAconnect 12:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Where did you find rule #2? It's very different from the tie break rules I know...--Nitsansh (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

2010 World Junior Ice Hockey Championships
I have been doing the IIHF U20 wiki since 2006, we have never opted to go for the three coloured approach. Over-complication. Slaja (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's been done in many articles on sports competition. If teams move on to different phases, that should be indicated somehow. I don't think three colours are too complicated, but If you don't like this idea, then another method should be done.--Nitsansh (talk) 19:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Whisperback
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  15:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

In volleyball, in NORCECA
In volleyball, in NORCECA, we have a specified layout, you cannot change without saying why our stablished format. Oscar987 16:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Sports calendar February 2007
I have nominated Sports calendar February 2007, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sports calendar February 2007. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WOSlinker (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Question
Hey, when do we add games for the EHF Champion League and the Basketball EuroLeague into the portal? And NFL every week? Kante4 (talk) 11:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's discuss this, and other matters, here.--Nitsansh (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: U21
Hey, did i marked them as qualified? Can´t remember that... Kante4 (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Running Man Barnstar

 * Thanks--Nitsansh (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: EuroBasket 2009 qualification
Hi, I've done most of the article, but I didn't do the calculations for the second placed teams. All I know is that the matches against the last placed team in the group A weren't counted, that's why I've reverted it... I am not sure where we can find the final table, but Bulgaria was obviously in front of France, I agree with that...--Vitriden (talk) 12:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Portal
Ok, was wondering. ;-) Kante4 (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

References for September 2010 in sports
We seem to be at cross purposes here. My starting point is when an article contains statements about hundreds of living people, it is going to need an awful lot of references. Yours seems to be that references can be found in other (detailed) articles linked to from this article. I appreciate that this is a general point rather than one specifically to do with this month's article, but if so, why not list just the events without the results? The current listing is open to the sort of subtle vandalism we've seen so often in data-centric summaries like climate tables, award winners and the like. - Pointillist (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The article in question is an archive page of Portal: Current events/Sports which is updated on a daily basis by (mainly) several dedicated editors. It would be difficult to insert mistaken results without anyone's notice... I for one check the new editions at least once a day and take special note at edits by unfamiliar editors...
 * I admit that I rarely check archived articles for errors, but I don't think the lack of references is the problem here...--Nitsansh (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've taken a look at the histories of the September 2005-2010 in sports articles, and it seems vandalism is rare and detected quickly. The pages are pretty hefty even without references anyway, so if it ain't broke I'll stop trying to fix it. Thanks for the prompt reply, btw. - Pointillist (talk) 08:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Izhak Mamistvalov
Hi. Thank you for the information you've added to the article on Izhak Mamistvalov. However, any information on a conviction for homicide added to an article about a living person must be fully and properly sourced. Please see: "Biographies of living persons". The only thing I've been able to find about the accident is this, and it's incomplete: http://www.israelparalympics.org/en/article.asp?articleid=76. I must ask you to indicate the sources for your information; otherwise, it will have to be removed, in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on the biographies of living people. Aridd (talk) 06:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I found no sources in English except that one. There are sources in Hebrew, if that helps.--Nitsansh (talk) 17:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The sources in Hebrew are fine. Thanks for adding them. Aridd (talk) 22:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rose Bowl
Hmm...good question. According to this it'll be Wisconsin via next week's BCS rankings. Tiebreakers can't split them on conference or overall. I'm no expert on college football, so don't quote me on it! :) Cs-wolves  (talk)  00:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The important thing is that it's yet to be determined...--Nitsansh (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that you have been granted "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide yo do not want the permission, let an administrator know and he can remove it. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  00:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks--Nitsansh (talk) 09:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Handball WC 2011
Just to answer your comment about a three-way-tie Alg, Cro and Serb. In that case, Algeria has lost both direct matches against Cro and Serb and thus will be ranked third of those three, so fourth in the group behind Denmark. Thus Croatia is already qualified. Denmark though could still finish fourth. -Koppapa (talk) 22:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I figured that a bit later and reversed my edit.--Nitsansh (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Volleyball
Why isn't volleyball events not notability enough to be displayed in the Curren events Portal:Current events/Sports/Sidebar‎?

Who decide this? Are there statistics? Why is Bobsleigh or Luge notable enough and volleyball is not? Why are you continuesly deleting volleball entries?

I think you are abusing. Osplace 01:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Let's do the discussion in the Portal's talk page...--Nitsansh (talk) 06:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

2011 European Youth Winter Olympic Festival
Hey, you have any info about the participating nations? Kante4 (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Only what you can find in the official website.--Nitsansh (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, will look at it later on again. Kante4 (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  23:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

2010–11 UEFA Champions League knockout phase
Thanks! --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Good idea in adding the goals in commented, but it's still better to add them in once the match is finished. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Smaller sidebar font
Yep, noticed that as well. Thought it had been changed by someone, but not too sure. Appears to be this... Cs-wolves  (talk)  01:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Portal:Current_events/Sports
A 180Kb deletion with no edit summary: diff. Is that what you meant to do? -- John of Reading (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, the deleted content was copied to February 2011 in sports.--Nitsansh (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, thanks. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

IPL
Why shouldnt the IPL be included in the list of current sports? ashwinikalantri talk 00:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Because we don't publish domestic league matches.--Nitsansh (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The IPL is anything but domestic! It has players from all the major cricket playing nations. ashwinikalantri  talk 18:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And if that is the case, then NBA, NASCAR should be the first to go! ashwinikalantri  talk 18:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

A cheezburger for you


Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  has given you a Cheeseburger! Cheeseburgers promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Cheeseburger, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of Cheeseburgers by adding {{subst:Cheeseburger}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  21:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)