User talk:Nittin Das

I am retire from this account

 * Nittin Das, you are already indefinitely blocked. Please understand, if you "retire from this account" it does not allow you to create a new account. It does not allow you to edit while not logged in. It is you who are blocked, not the account. All edits you make will be undone. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia until this account is unblocked. I hope that is clear. Thank you. --IamNotU (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok understand Nittin Das (talk) 06:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Recent edits to State-sponsored terrorism
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, State-sponsored terrorism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

The material was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Kalantak moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kalantak, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  16:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Nittin Das, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Kalantak have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Your addition to Talk:Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 13:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop restoring unsourced material at Alien invasion
That's against basic policy, see WP:VERIFY. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nittin Das/Hindunism and Zoroastrianism


A tag has been placed on User:Nittin Das/Hindunism and Zoroastrianism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hindupedia.com/en/Zoroastrianism_and_Hinduism. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Hinduism and Zoroastrianism


A tag has been placed on Template:Hinduism and Zoroastrianism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Deleted after TfD, can't find the link but check the logs; repeatedly recreated in the wrong place, please salt"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 07:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hinduism and Zoroastrianism (March 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hinduism and Zoroastrianism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hinduism and Zoroastrianism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hinduism_and_Zoroastrianism Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DannyS712&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hinduism_and_Zoroastrianism reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for copyright violation
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright law very seriously, and I see above that you have been previously warned. If you continue this behavior after your block expires, you can expect that it will be reimposed as an indefinite block. Zerotalk 11:25, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 18:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Could you please return to the following Talk page?
Hello, Mr. Das,

Good morning.

I see that you have been blocked from editing for a period. Fortunately, such block doesn't hinder me from writing to you.

Please refer to the page, Talk:Criticism of Islam. The list of hostile verses you have posted is very limited in scope.

I have a full compilation of the verses.

So I believe you would be helped. You could talk on the afore-mentioned talk page instead of here.

Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Please unblocked doom marauder account
I have understand my mistake. The problem that I was facing that how to insert link in wikipedia. When I learned to insert link and source. After that I have created doom marauder

Nittin Das (talk) 04:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

If the administrator unblock my nittin das account I will stop doing sockpuppeting Nittin Das (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Pleae unblock me I do not want to become sockpuppet
I'm copying the following from my talk page for reference:

Hi Nittin Das, I'm glad that you don't want to do any more sockpuppetry. if you want to get unblocked, you need to show that you understand what you did wrong. You need to explain what you will do in the future instead. That is, not only about the sockpuppetry, but about why you got blocked in the first place. See: WP:GAB. Because you did not wait for the three months of your block, but you made sockpuppet accounts instead, you will probably have to wait six months from today, before you can apply again to get unblocked. See: WP:STANDARDOFFER. An admin will answer your unblock request with more information, but you will probably not be unblocked at this time. --IamNotU (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Your unblock request was denied. You can come back in six months and try again. In the meantime, probably you can edit at https://hi.wikipedia.org/ ? Please do not make any more edits, or new accounts here, while you are blocked. If you do, you will not be able to get unblocked. Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 11:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I have to wait for six months without editing Nittin Das (talk) 11:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes. Then you will need to explain that you understand about copyright and sockpuppetry. I have also only just now noticed these comments, you will need to explain that you understand that they are completely unacceptable:, , and . There is no guarantee you will get unblocked, especially if you do not understand what is wrong with those comments. You can start by reading: Hate speech. --IamNotU (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I already stop hate speech.It was that time when I was new to wikipediaNittin Das (talk) 12:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and that other time too, when you had already created half a dozen sockpuppets, and came back months later to make the same edits:, , ? At first I thought you were a young man who just wanted to edit about food and the army, and had trouble with the language and understanding about copyright, and got caught in sockpuppetry. But now that I've looked more closely at your history, and seen these kind of edits, plus all the "it wasn't me" lies... I don't think you're suitable as a Wikipedia editor. You can try again in six months, but I think you'll need a couple of years at least of growing up. Good luck with that. --IamNotU (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I already stop hate speech.It was that time when I was new to wikipediaNittin Das (talk) 12:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and that other time too, when you had already created half a dozen sockpuppets, and came back months later to make the same edits:, , ? At first I thought you were a young man who just wanted to edit about food and the army, and had trouble with the language and understanding about copyright, and got caught in sockpuppetry. But now that I've looked more closely at your history, and seen these kind of edits, plus all the "it wasn't me" lies... I don't think you're suitable as a Wikipedia editor. You can try again in six months, but I think you'll need a couple of years at least of growing up. Good luck with that. --IamNotU (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and that other time too, when you had already created half a dozen sockpuppets, and came back months later to make the same edits:, , ? At first I thought you were a young man who just wanted to edit about food and the army, and had trouble with the language and understanding about copyright, and got caught in sockpuppetry. But now that I've looked more closely at your history, and seen these kind of edits, plus all the "it wasn't me" lies... I don't think you're suitable as a Wikipedia editor. You can try again in six months, but I think you'll need a couple of years at least of growing up. Good luck with that. --IamNotU (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok understand Nittin Das (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Continued socking
I've reverted two edits of, as they are obviously continued sockpuppetry by Nittin Das. --IamNotU (talk) 16:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

If the administrator unblock my nittin das account I will stop doing sockpuppeting Nittin Das (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Nittin Das (talk) 07:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Bro unblock the account
If the administrator unblock my nittin das account I will stop doing sockpuppeting Nittin Das (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)