User talk:Nityagiri

License tagging for Image:Amma.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Amma.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Amma.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Amma.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 17:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Girija Maa
A tag has been placed on Girija Maa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- One more night 04:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Girija Maa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TheRingess (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

July
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

'''you have now created this three times. It's been deleted twice as non notable and once as advertising--both reasons clearly apply. It you re-create it again, you will be blocked DGG''' 03:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * For an article on this subject to be in wikipedia, it will have to demonstrate that the subject is notable, and it will have to provide the sort of objective information that belongs in an encyclopedia. To prove it is notable, you will need to find third parties, independent of the subject, who have said so in reputable published sources. An article about her work in a well-known newspaper would be an example of such a source.The merits of the subject's guru or grandfather is of no relevance here, besides possibly interesting biography.
 * Advertising in a WP sense is material promoting or praising the person or the person's services, rather than describing them objectively. From the article "Girija Maa's knowledge is boundless, an eternal flow of Yoga wisdom bestows this Master of Yoga." is promotion, not encyclopedic information. Calling her a  "magnificent spiritual leader in South India" is not objective description.
 * If you can write a sourced article, do so on your talk page, and either ask me (or another admin) to look, or ask at WP:Deletion Review. But i advise you very strongly that it will not pass without good sources. Before you write the article, you might want to tell me what the sources are. DGG 06:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)