User talk:Nivose

Clarification
Hi, if you are in a position to offer clarification in the Maximilien Robespierre article, I think that would be tremendously helpful. Right now the Early Life section reads a little confusingly, which I think is what has been a source of frequent changes. Also, there's no reason to put unpleasant or sarcastic notes in your explanations of changes. Most of us are simply trying to maintain order on a limited schedule. Thanks. Zhuravlei (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, did not mean to offend. Just "P. sure..." in the comment does not sound as "Absolutely sure...". Personally I don't care about who and when Robespierre parents or great parents were or did. Only, "Maximilien de Robespierre, established himself in Arras as a lawyer" does not make sense in "Early life" section, when "His paternal grandfather, Maximilien de Robespierre, established himself in Arras as a lawyer" does. Check the French version, at least, please. If I was a dictator, I would take all this stuff out of the article - this is not very reliable info. What is important - revolutionary years.Nivose (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of National Convention
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article National Convention you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 00:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Nivose, it has been over seven weeks since the review was begun, with clear issues needing to be addressed, yet there has been no action on your part. Unless you take action on the nomination soon, I imagine that it's going to have to be closed as unsuccessful by reviewer Royroydeb. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of National Convention
The article National Convention you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:National Convention for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)