User talk:Nixeagle/Archive/2008/August

Autoconfirm
Just got autoconfirmed the day after I posted this LOL. Thanks! :) NitrogenTSRH (talk) 17:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

The L.C.W. Collection
nixeagle hi this is scangemi, per our discussion, the content I am trying to retrieve is the article about The L.C.W. Collection Thanks SebastianScangemi (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Prince Chunk
Prince Chunk is now under deletion review. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 21:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

You're BACK!
Hey, you're back, do you have any time to spare on Image Resizer Bot?  MBisanz  talk 16:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I can if the task is still open. However it will take me a week or so to catch up to everything going on :) ——  nix eagle 16:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Great, I can re-activate the task whenever you want to jump back in, lemme know in a week or so.  MBisanz  talk 16:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Interesting comment here
Hi Nixeagle - thought you might be interested to see this comment yesterday. It can be enjoyed alone, or one might compare it with this from the day before. My well-known weaknesses as a thinker probably make it impossible for me to work out what important principles of the project are on display.

I don't think I'm canvassing, but just in case I've sent it to User:Nishidani as well. PRtalk 09:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If you have a point to make, please make it in plain language. If you don't like what those folks have said, take it up with them. As I have said in the discussion on AN, I think this needs to move to ARBCOM, as I don't see how the community is going to resolve the whole thing. ——  nix eagle 13:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

List of fascist movements by country G-M
Hi, can Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh be mentioned in the article?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Do we have sources that state that they are "fascist"? Are those sources reliable? I'm currently weeding out those with sources I don't understand or those that don't have any sources at all in the respective articles. If there are sources, feel free to cite them in the fashion that I have started doing on the article and put it in. ——  nix eagle 19:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The Durga Vahini is described as proto-fascist organization and the source is Liberation and Purity by Chetan Bhatt which is RS. Can it be mentioned?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Here is a source about RSS  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 19:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If you have the criteria I listed above, go ahead and put it in. If you are asking me because I removed it (I don't remember which ones I removed), I won't remove sourced entries, so long as they have the source in tags immediately after the link to the article. I'm chiefly cleaning up unsourced crap, as we can't be calling groups fascists without at least a source other then us calling them that. ——  nix eagle 19:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Spotlight coordinators
I don't think I did the original bolding, and I just couldn't be bothered to add ststus indicators for everyone ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Contribs 17:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

FYI, La Fayette et al
Hi Nixeagle, I uh did install Ubuntu and it um froze halfway through the install and windows is gone...so I can only access the internet via the Ubuntu that boots from the CD. Anywaym what that means is that I'm going to be MIA until I get this fixed (i.e. I don't have IRC), for the most part. I'll be back ASAP. The internet does work, so I can take a look at something that you folks are working on, although for the time being it'll have to be via talk page. Lazulilasher (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Gilbert du Motier, marquis de La Fayette
I apologise if the edits were not vandalism. i was simply responding to a deletion of large amount of text. When i checked what had happened the system showed the deletion of an entire section which looked properly sourced and written, there was no clear edit summary explaining the deletion so I reverted it as vandalism. If this was in error, it was meant in good faith. --Brideshead (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

"MARQUIS" "LA FAYETTE" NAMING FRAUDS stemming from old British Empire and French Press

 * I am a new American editor with over 30 years researching Lafayette and I'm responding, as a courtesy, to your request for birth certificate.
 * No American Lafayette scholar (who wishes to keep his reputation) would make this "LA FAYETTE" error (or use "Marquis" in present tense or post-1790 usage, since General Lafayette was the principle author of the vote in which the aristocracy was abolished in France and that remains abolished today).


 * These errors stem from original (British)Encyclopedia Britannica (SEE the perfect paper trail in old editions through current edition available in google-books) and post Restoration French Press in the early 19th century that started that fraud. Wikipedia rules are very specific about known sources of fraud especially when they are designed to deceive.
 * It seems those old British Empire and French editors were quite upset about Lafayette's leadership in the abolishment of the French aristocracy/nobility in 1790 and many paybacks ensued from those aristocrat editors that continue through to this day.


 * ALSO NOTE:


 * --From his birth certificate, through all his written letters and his grave stone all contain one word; LAFAYETTE.


 * --Americans for over 100 years(including many decades after Lafayette's death) knew to ignore the old Ency. Britannica and old British and aristocratic-French Press frauds. Many US towns were named LAFAYETTE (all 1 word) during these years when Americans knew about these British and post-Restoration French frauds on Lafayette's name.    SEE E.E.Brandon, General Lafayette, 4 Vols. who documented the American Press and found >90% knew about the fraud and it was nearly wiped out in U.S.

Calling Lafayette "Marquis" (in post 1790 usage) is like calling a former slave from Georgia, after Lincoln's Abolition of Slavery, still a slave.
 * --So called historians that throw those "MARQUIS" "LA FAYETTE" titles around (in present tense usage and in post 1790 references) is one great way to spot the "not so thorough" phony historians.


 * SEE also


 * '''1)--Gottschalk, Louis, "Lafayette Comes to America, 1935, pp. 153-154, titled, Lafayette, LaFayette, or La Fayette?"   (Gottschalk is one of best Lafayette historians in the last 100 years. He also wrote an excellent book titled, "Jean Paul Marat" that is far better than Wikipedia's current Marat page in covering Marat's roots and education in Britain.


 * 2)--[| Lafayette's Memoirs Vol. 2, pgs. 392-394]


 * As I'm sure the American Lafayette scholars noticed that many of the editors, know little about Lafayette and little about the old Britannica fraud of which there is a perfect paper trail, that has now been exposed.


 * Their insistence that Lafayette was born in Chavagnac,Cabal??? and demoting his highest achieved military rank, from Lieutenant General of Garde Nationale-3 stars to Major General-2 stars, is typical of these editors low and faulty level of accurate, Lafayette-historical knowledge.(SEE their edits dated 18 August,2008) Notice also the references they present are from either non-referenced sources or from poor, shaky sources that are non-referenced when you dig to their origin. (e.g. The American Friends of Lafayette (web site, that is used as a reference?), recently elected a new President that is correcting many of these obvious "fraud copying" errors from the past.)


 * Wikipedia rules are very clear about use of non-credible and deliberately deceptive sources containing fraud.


 * '''--An exact photocopy of Lafayette's authenticated birth certificate can be found in;
 * Pialoux,Paul; Lafayette, TROIS REVOLUTIONS POUR LA LIBERTE, 1989, Edition Watel, pg. 24.'''


 * --"Lafayette" and "duMotier" in one word appear in one word on his baptismal certificate, all his letters, Memoirs and grave stone. His grave stone also contains a "D." (but no "M.") reinforcing the one word non-aristocratic form of "duMotier.
 * It is now clear, some of the editors are promoting this well known fraud and engaging in a repeated, nearly fascist, vandalism (including erasing key, very high level, historian references like Louis Gottschalk etc.)


 * You need to ask yourself, are you a proponent of "Wikipedia-Britannica" (sic) to continue that same old Encyclopedia Britannica fraud?
 * Please note, this Wikipedia Lafayette page started off as a copy of the complete original 1911 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica's page for Lafayette that continued the same British fraud through every one of those old Britannica editions.


 * Do we really wish to return to that same old British Empire and aristocratic-French press fraud?


 * "We bow not the neck,


 * We bend not the knee,


 * But our hearts Lafayette,


 * We surrender to thee." 


 * --This poem appeared repeatedly, in many 19th century American newspapers, showing that their editors knew very well, to ignore those old Britannica and aristocratic-French Press frauds.
 * CUR NON?--68.162.239.221 (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have noticed that you have sent this exact same message to more or less everyone that has edited the article. You apparently have not seen my response to you on the talk page: Talk:Gilbert du Motier, marquis de La Fayette. Please read it before sending me another message here. Thanks :) ——  nix eagle 21:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

ANI search
Can a boolean OR be added to the ANI search tool? I see GeorgeMoney is retired; if you're not able to code it maybe I can find someone who can if you provide the code. --Random832 (contribs) 16:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Procar
I've had a chance to go over all of your suggestions and attempt to improve the article. There are a few questions of my own that I left, so feel free to toss in your own opinion and make any other suggestions you see. The359 (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have found some book sources available through Google Books which have now been added to the article, and there is the possibility of more information forthcoming from the New York Times digital archive, although I have yet to be able to access it. However, as it stands now, two book sources have been added to the article. The359 (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ procar passed GA ——  nix eagle 19:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)