User talk:Nixon1654

Welcome!
Hello, Nixon1654, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

That's the problem, it's not my contributions that conflict with NPOV, it's the very discrepanies brought up my contribution pointed out. ZERO citations based on bias ideological basis they do not belong there. Fact. There is no citations, pure ideological bias. The only citations to anything related to it, resides on its own wiki, wherein it states a personal interpretation. Pointing out sections with don't conform to NPOV is not a breach of NPOV, by its very essence. It's calling instances out,  Nixon1654 (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanction Notification
 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)