User talk:Niyazi93

Actually, your user page had no vandalism on it. I have nevertheless replaced it with a note indicating that you are blocked indefinitely. --Yamla 17:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

indefinitly means permanently?

and secondly, it HAD vandalism on it before the other person got blocked because apperently their account had got hacked in to... and even if it had, doesnt that go a little harsh on me, being the victim of some idiots contributions on my page, and what did you do to stop it?... NOTHING!

but I am a very forgiving person. --Yamla 20:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC) ... yea right, so did you just block me coz you got bored flicking through these unblock reasons...some admin...

anyway, thanx for blocking me, now you've made sure that my account can't get vandelised.

(this is aimed at Yamla, so make him/her read it)

you are abusing your Adim responsibilities, if i was anyone important to get listened to, then i would report you!

now i cant even tell you to read these arguments against you, because i cant even EDIT your disscsion page to tell you to read my disscusion page!

so this is why i will make another unblock notice even though im not ment to! (p.s, yes, i am that desprate to get my view across)

A user may be blocked when necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of the Wikimedia Foundation, its users or the public. A block for protection may be necessary in response to:

persistently making personal attacks; making personal, professional or legal threats (including outside the Wikipedia site); performing actions that place users in danger; disclosing personal information (whether or not the information is accurate); persistently violating copyrights; accounts that appear to have been compromised, as an emergency measure.

I DID NONE OF THESE!