User talk:Nizharpadam

Mountain Photo & Minor Edits
I noticed that you made some edits recently aimed at incorporating your newly uploaded mountain photograph into the Landscape Photography and Nature photography articles. While the image is very nice, its presence in those articles was superfluous, as mountain imagery was already proportionately represented in both. Perhaps it may be useful in the Munnar article, instead?

In addition, you marked both edits as 'minor', even though both added a photo and one even created an entirely new article section. 'Minor' edits, according to WP:MINOR, are edits which need "no review and could never be the subject of a dispute". Adding images and article sections usually exceeds the threshold at which an edit can be characterized as 'minor'. In addition, the 'Landscape photography' section that you added to the Nature photography article was a verbatim copy of the 'Ethics' section; no new content, at all. I'm not certain if this was a mistake or not, but that's why such edits shouldn't be marked as 'minor', since they require review. —Jgcoleman (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)