User talk:Nizil Shah/Archive 14

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swatantra Theatre has been accepted
 Swatantra Theatre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Swatantra_Theatre help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Nizil (talk) 06:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The Good Majaraja
Hi. I have created a new draft on an upcoming film which is based on the Maharaja of Jamnagar. Can you please check it ? Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)


 * And please also check the draft Draft:Hardik Sangani created by someone else. I improved the drafts with reliable sources. Each facts are verifiable now. It passes NACTOR, because the subject has played multiple significant roles in notable films and TV shows. A redirect Hardik Sangani is already exist with  tag. Additionally, can you create category for 'Actors in Gujarati theatre'? I don't know how to create it. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately the draft of Hardik Sangani has been declined and the reviewer cited the 'advertisement issue'. I don't know which parts of the article read like an advertisement. Imfarhad7 (talk) 15:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Will look into both articles very soon. Nizil (talk) 06:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think Draft:The Good Maharaja should bw deleted. Sanjay Dutt has already left the project. So there is no major known actor in the film. Director and cast have changed too. The shooting is yet to start and pandemic is also there. So far, it is just a "proposed film". And legal trouble is pending too. I think the film is in development hell. So there should be no hurry in creating the article. There is a real possibility that the film is never made. Two sentences about film in article of Jamnagar king is enough to cover it, imo. You can always retrived deleted drafts in future. So when film goes into production/post-production, we can have this draft retrieved. Regards, Nizil (talk) 06:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok. I understand. This is the same Project which Sanjay Dutt left. Currently we have cast members and release date. I would like to keep draft. When the date of principe photography and the details about shooting will be revealed, I will add it into draft, so that it become eligible for article according to WP:NFILM. Can you please check new article Kon Halave Limdi Ne Kon Zulave Pipli and Draft:Hardik Sangani. ? Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 07:57, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. Please see Draft:The Good Maharaja. I have added the date of principle photography. The new source I have cited into draft confirms that Sanjay Dutt is playing lead role. Additionally, it says that the shooting of the film was started in 2020, but stopped due to the pandemic. WP:NFF states that "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". Can we publish this article now? It passes WP:GNG as well. On Friday, I will visit Baba Lului's Mosque and Mir Abu Turab's Tomb. If there are any places in nearby area, let me know. So I can click all images in single tour. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 19:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * OK. The Good Maharaja can be created then. Please do check all references and correct if any discrepancy. I will move it soon after some copyediting and cleanups. Thanks for providing images. Other nearby places to Baba Lului's mosque are Nawab Sardar Khan's Roza, Sardar bridge, FD Arts and Commerce College for Women, Swaminarayan Arts College. Gaekwad Haveli is an important historical place there too but be careful while photographing it as it is a police crime branch headquarters. :) Ask for permission from police if possible and do click just exterior of the fortification and a small museum inside it if accessible. If you find it difficult or denied permission, it is fine to not photograph it. Nizil (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Checked the references and contents, edited a little bit. You can do necessary cleanups and publish it. I will click those images tomorrow. Thanks for letting me know about crime branch headquarter. I didn't know that. Imfarhad7 (talk) 11:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. Please see my recent uploads on commons. I couldn't click Nawab Sardar Khan's Roza. May b next time. Baba Lului's Mosque was Locked up, so I clicked its photo from outside. I will revisit it when It will be open. Please review Kon Halave Limdi Ne Kon Zulave Pipli as well. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 16:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Kon Halave.. needs a section on Reception (critical and commecial). At least two reviews should be there. Please do add Talkpage too. Everything else looks good. The Good Maharaja is ready to go. And many thanks for fantastic images. Nizil (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please link TGM wherever applicable. Like filmographies and all. Nizil (talk) 06:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Instead of an article on Bandhutva Smarak, I would suggest an article on Vasant-Rajab. There are sources available for it. And Smarak can be also covered in it. There is an another memorial dedicated to them in Panch Pipali, Khamasa (see ). There is a school named after them as well. So their history and all of their memorials can covered. What do you think? Nizil (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Few sources:
 * 
 * 
 * Nizil (talk) 07:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for suggestion. I will surely create article on Vasant-Rajab. I also gathered some materials from Google book. I did't find any review of Kon Halave Limdi Ne Kon Zulave Pipli, so I can't create the Reception section. I think, it passes GNG. The article has enough references. Can you please review Draft:Swatantra Theatre. It is a theater organization in Pune. I will click its image when I visit Pune sometime in next month. If you want me to click any photo from Pune city-area, please let me know. Imfarhad7 (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Swatantra Theatre has been reviewed. I am not much aware of Pune. Still if I find a place to click, I will inform you here. Regards, - Nizil (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 starts today
Hello, WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 starts today. The India WikiProject has a backlog of around 10,000 unassessed articles, built up over the last few years. The time has come for comprehensive housekeeping and that's what this drive is all about. The drive will run from 1 September 2021 to 30 September 2021.

We request you to participate in the assessment drive. Learn more about the event here, learn assessment process and rewards details. Please add your name as a participant here.

Feel free to discuss this on the event talk page or at WikiProject India noticeboard.

You received this message, because you participated in earlier iteration of the assessment drive, or we felt that you may be interested to participate. --Titodutta (talk) 02:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski,  BennyOnTheLoose, 🇷🇼 Amakuru and  Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Rastrakutas
Rastrakutas are jains Dridhaprahara (talk) 08:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * It's complicated. From Rashtrakuta article: ...The early kings of this dynasty were influenced by Hinduism and the later kings by Jainism. ... Almost all of their inscriptions begin with an invocation to god Vishnu or god Shiva. See Rashtrakuta dynasty. Most of them were Hindus and some inclined towards Jainism but in general they patronized all local regions in their territory. - Nizil (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Later Rastrakutas kings are Jains only Even last Rastrakuta king Indra IV took Sallekhana in Shravanabelagola you are Gujrathi Jain Im Kannadiga you have 0 knowledge about kannada Jain Dridhaprahara (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Please provide academic reference for the claim (reference should qualify as per WP:RS). It is already clear that "all" Rashtrakuta kings were not Jains, only some were inclined towards Jainism. The text posted above is supported by references in the article. Please check them. I am open to change/update if reliable academic sources are provided. See WP:V also. Regards, Nizil (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

 * Thank you very much. You have been great friend and collaborator here. I hope to continue my work here. - Nizil (talk) 08:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Hardik Sangani
Hi. Can you please see Draft:Hardik Sangani. I edited it after reviewer's comment, and removed unreliable sources. I have re-submitted it for review. The subject have received enough coverage, so passes WP:GNG. Right? He has appeared in multiple films as a lead actor, so also passes WP:NACTOR. What you think? I am also working on Draft:Harun-Arun. Feel free to expand it. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sangani looks notable and you have cleaned it well. TV filmography is incomplete. Please expand his stage works with refs too. It was replaced by redirect in past so need to be careful while creating it again. His most films are released in 2020 so may look like WP:TOOSOON/WP:NYA. But he has long TV and stage career so expand on that front. That may help this article pass. I will look into Draft:Harun-Arun. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Can you please check Draft:Arun Shankar. It was created by someone else and got declined due to poor sources and promotional tone. I have modified it majorly with NPOV. The person has won the National Award. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The National Award makes him notable IMO. Btw volume of his work is too small so other might object his notability. There are some formatting and repeatation issues which I will correct soon. Many choices of words are still promotional. Thanks for rescuing the article. Btw did you take part in Wiki Loves Monuments 2021? It is a monument photography competition with prizes. As you are photographer, please participate as you take wonderful photos. In past, our local Wikipedian had won the prize. Have a look. Can you look into Draft:Rashmin Majithia? - Nizil (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * WP:NACTOR says that the actor 'has had significant roles in multiple notable films' and the person 'has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment'. Arun Shankar passes first criteria as he has acted in two notable films. He also passes second criteria as his role in the film 'The Chameleon' was awarded National Award and the role was called 'innovative' in the award citation. I will look into Draft:Rashmin Majithia. Source issue is there. I will try to find out some sources. The link you provided for Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 is not working. Can you provide me the exact link. I would be happy to participate. I am also preparing Draft:Harun-Arun for publishing. Thank you very much for your help. Imfarhad7 (talk) 14:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2021_in_India Nizil (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * .Check link above.- Nizil (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok. Thanks for providing the link. I will click the images and upload. Imfarhad7 (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. Can you please review Hawa Hawa and Draft:Arun Shankar? Imfarhad7 (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * A gentle reminder :) Imfarhad7 (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please add talkpage and projects of Hawa Hawa. And thank you for rescuing Arun Shankar article. I have made minor improvements. To your note, both articles are previously deleted. I find no problem in recreating them but do improve their referencing if any. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gujarati Asmita
Hello, Nizil Shah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gujarati Asmita, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:The Global Desi
Hello, Can you please review Draft:The Global Desi? Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)


 * There is a lack of independent reviews of the book. The book article needs at least two "independent" reviews to qualify as notable. Currently two reviews in the article are published by Usha Uthup who is also writer of its Forward so she has a conflict of interest in the book. Her reviews do not qualify as "independent" as per WP:BKCRIT. Second, Usha Uthup is a singer so her reviews also not qualify as "critical reception" either. Please add two valid reviews to pass it. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 08:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Update on previous articles
Hi Nizil... sorry to bother you. I noticed several articles we previously worked on look quite different now eg Jallianwala Bagh and others related to it....advice plaese...should I leave it for time being? or adjust? Whispyhistory (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Following recent renovations in Jallianwala Bagh, the article received a lot of attention. Please compare the previous and current revisions. Revert/restore where needed and remove/trim where needed. Removed uncited things as well. I will keep an eye and will help wherever needed. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is, who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:


 * 1) with 5072 points
 * 2) with 3276 points
 * 3) with 3197 points
 * 4) with 1611 points
 * 5) with 1571 points
 * 6) with 1420 points
 * 7) with 1043 points
 * 8) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
 * wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
 * wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:List of cultural references to the COVID-19 pandemic


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:List of cultural references to the COVID-19 pandemic, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of forts in Gujarat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taranga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jairam Shivji
Hello, Nizil Shah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jairam Shivji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2021 Nagaland killings


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2021 Nagaland killings. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2021 Oting Nagaland massacre. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2021 Oting Nagaland massacre. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 08:49, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm AlexEng. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Lakhimpur Kheri violence without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Eng ( TALK ) 04:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Decemeber 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2021 Nagaland killings, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is with reference to your addition of "21 Para Special Forces" as the perpetrator when none of the sources state so. If you are particularly referencing Amit Shah's statement (which I believe he misspoke), please state so. 2405:201:4013:8162:405B:FCF:DF18:96B3 (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Reassessment of Rudra Mahalaya Temple
Rudra Mahalaya Temple has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. You are the sole significant contributor excluding the (now-retired) nominator. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Orphaned non-free image File:21mu Tiffin film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:21mu Tiffin film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of human stampedes and crushes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Shav Vahini Ganga
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Discuss before reverting article
Before your revert, please make sure to have constructive and collaborative discussion in Talk:Krishna Janmasthan Temple Complex.

Thanks

Devesh S N Bhatta (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I had already added a comment about infobox on talkpage in past. See Talk:Krishna_Janmasthan_Temple_Complex. I had written I have kept some helpful changes in infobox but others are removed because it was unnecessarily cluttering the infobox (those things are already covered in article in detail). Also edit summary is there too. The info you added in infobox is inaccurate as well. E.g. Temple built in 1 CE by unknown is not mentioned anywhere or has no reference to back it. So please revert back. You re-added previously removed info from infobox. Please discuss it before re-adding it again. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
 * The template db-afc-move has been created - this template is similar to db-move when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

New Article
Hi. Hope, everything is well with you. Can you please review my draft article Draft:Abhishek Iyengar if possible? Imfarhad7 (talk) 10:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have gone through the article. The article is borderline notable in my opinion. The references are mostly about plays, not about the writer himself. I also found that he has written some films too. So his screenwriting career should be also included. Please find some more references exclusively about him. Local language references are also acceptable. Is there any major award received by him? If yes, please add it too. Check WP:NBASIC. -- Nizil (talk) 07:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your suggestions. I added 'Awards section' in article. In my opinion, the article fulfills the 3rd & 4th criteria of WP:AUTHOR and WP:DIRECTOR: (3) The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. and (4) The person's work (or works) has: (c) won significant critical attention. Thanks. Imfarhad7 (talk) 09:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Already accepted. Thank you for creating it. Please do add his filmography.- Nizil (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Pushpaben Mehta
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging