User talk:Njaelkies Lea/Archive1

Welcome
UtherSRG (talk) 05:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was one huge template! Hope you don't mind I made it a bit smaller.. Anyway, thanks for the welcome, and thanks a lot for working on the articles I started, just try to make correct changes. :) --Njaelkies Lea (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

To-de-loo!
Ah, you are here as well. I could say "well met" now, but I think we both know that I wouldn't mean it. Anyway, feel free to browse my edits for POV. Nothing like a watchman to keep one on one's toes, right? User:Lorkonius (talk) 21:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, if it isn't Mr. Xenophobic! Kind of addicted, aren't you? [[Image:Animalien-smiley.gif|18px]] Njaelkies Lea (talk) 23:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I do tend to get a bit carried away when falsely accused. No matter, it's all water under the bridge now. Lorkonius (talk) 13:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Indeed it is. I don't mind people with different views participating on Wikipedia, quite the opposite actually, as long as they try their best not to push their personal views in articles. What worries me about you is the fact that you referred to your participation on Wikipedia as "a scuffle on the field of honor". I don't see my work here as any battle or game, I do what I do to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. You can help, but I think you need to reconsider your attitude for that. Remember that an articles NPOV is not achieved by two sides adding equal amounts of POV, but that any one person must set aside their personal opinions and do their best to provide NPOV in the first place. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * We all push our personal views. There is no neutrality. If I somehow provide enough sources and sound reasoning to make everyone agree with my POV, is that not consensus? Is that not the new NPOV? Is that not, in fact, to make Wikipedia better? Of course I won't start edit wars. There's no point in that, since it will only get you blocked eventually. I will suggest edits. If they are not accepted by consensus, I will whine for a bit and then move on. Should I be completely ignored - well, there are other 'pedias out there.


 * And, finally, everything is a game. Lorkonius (talk) 19:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You so full of shit.. :) Have fun trying to evade bans, it's unlikely they will be by my hand though as I don't have any political articles on my watch list. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)