User talk:Njatel

Speedy deletion of Okanagan Basin Water Board
A tag has been placed on Okanagan Basin Water Board, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. The Llama! (talk) 16:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Okanagan Basin Water Board
A tag has been placed on Okanagan Basin Water Board, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. The Llama! (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Okanagan basin water board
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Okanagan basin water board, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.obwb.ca/structure_governance. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I note the comment you left on the (soon to be deleted) talk page of the deleted article at Okanagan basin water board. Unfortunately this doesn't address the copyright situation in a useful way. Please read through the material at WP:COPYRIGHT to find out where the assertion of copyright permission needs to be made and by whom. If you have any questions, I'll try to assist you. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Contingency plan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Is there a reason you are adding information regarding "sailing plans" to articles that, in this case, aren't about sailing specifically, and, in the case of Sail plan, is about a rigging chart? The tone of the additions is not appropriate as well; please see WP:NOTHOWTO.  Julietdeltalima   (talk) '' 19:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)