User talk:Njk47

Welcome!
Hello, Njk47, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Nijk47, welcome to Wikipedia. I am Barkeep49 an experienced Wikipedian. I saw your work on George (novel) - thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. I made a couple small tweaks: giving a link for Scholastic, and renaming controversy because in general we try to avoid that as a section title. One note: you've been marking a lot of your edits as minor. Minor edits are for things like adding a comma, or captializing a word. When you add new information that is not considered a minor edit - even if you're only adding one new sentence. I know you get help through WikiEd, but as Children's literature is a major focus of mine if I can be of any help please let me know. Otherwise thanks for your edits and I look forward to other improvements to come as you continue in your class. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi! I have a note along with what wrote. My note is to avoid using sites like Goodreads for information about books. It's not that the material is universally incorrect, but it's relatively easy for users to gain the ability to edit book information and add material that can be wrong. For example, in 2007 author Scott Sigler released a podcast novel, Nocturnal. Five years later, he released a dramatically re-written and revamped version of the novel through Crown Publishing. Well meaning users kept merging the page for the podcast version with the print version, assuming that they were the same thing, when at least 40-50% of the work was different, essentially making it a completely different work. It thus created an incorrect listing for both the old and the new versions of the work. It's better to avoid using it as a source, at least in general. I'd suggest using WorldCat or primary sources for this, if the content is visible there. It can be a good place to start if you're looking to see if a book exists, but I wouldn't use it as an authoritative source unless you're sourcing something such as a Goodreads award.
 * On a related side note, this is a great article to improve! There's a lot that you can do here and I'm intrigued to see how you expand this - this was a great choice! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)