User talk:Nkgw rino

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stardust Promotion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stardust Promotion was changed by Nkgw rino (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909474 on 2016-10-01T07:34:20+00:00.

September 2017
Hello, I'm Eurodyne. I noticed that in this edit to Cherrybelle, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eurodyne (talk) 00:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cherrybelle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 00:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 12:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your edits at RFPP
Your edits keep replacing the example. You need to read the directions carefully there. Note, though, that the page you are requesting will NOT be protected. There is simply not enough activity there to justify protection. only (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Revert
Hello I've reverted your removal of content in the Cherrybelle article. Information that's (presumably) accurate about past performances of a musician shouldn't be removed simply because that musician is no longer active. Please feel free to update (without deleting) the status of the musician in another edit. Sak ura Cart elet Talk 01:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)