User talk:Nkon21/Archive 4

Certification for Fantastic Baby
Hi there. Just letting you know that I don't doubt there is a double platinum certification for this song, but usually specifying the top page for all certifications is not enough, you need to specify the year and month for verifiability. I don't read Japanese so I apologize if the certification can somehow be deduced from the top page itself. --Muhandes (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am aware; thanks for reaching out. I was actually planning to take a deep dive into fixing and replacing all the sources soon. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  21:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know. You can use certification Table Entry to easily specify the source, like I did here. It is not mandatory, but if you don't, the table will not match the footnotes at certification Table Bottom, which may cause a bot to "fix" it. --Muhandes (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Umpah Umpah
It is nice to see you have undertaken your first proper GA review after having promoted two articles to GA-status recently; I was considering that article myself but it is fine since I found other ones to review instead, hope your progress goes well! --K. Peake 17:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  19:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Great to see the reviewer has addressed everything; I look forward to seeing your pass later today, hopefully! --K. Peake 16:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for I Am the Best
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Long-term abuse
Hey Nkon! It’s Doggy54321 here. I was looking at User:Nkon21/sandbox3, and I couldn’t help but notice that this has been going on since September 2020. I was wondering if you are considering filing a report at WP:LTA, as it’s certainly been long and abusive.

In related news, is still active, and has been for a little under three weeks. I’m currently rollbacking all of their edits, as I believe their edits can all be classified as vandalism now, as this has been going on for four months. I would appreciate it if you shared your thoughts on this. Please ping me when you reply! Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 03:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't be opposed to that. They don't show any intent on stopping and have not responded to a single warning that was given to them, so a LTA case may be warranted. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  20:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, cool! If this is a pressing issue to you, I’d say make the report. I’m on and on-and-off Wikibreak until Thursday/Friday, and when I come back, it will generally just be checking in on my watchlist, making sure nothing blows up, etc. I don’t think I’ll have time in my schedule to draft and publish a full LTA, as some of them are detailed as heck. If it’s not a big deal to you, I can make the report when I come back. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 03:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

My GA
I am happy you are supporting me in the WP:GAN of Doraemon. Do you think the article is satisfying GA qualities at present, or does it need more improvements. Please ping me with your response or suggestions.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 06:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for I Love You (2NE1 song)
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 00:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Why are you editorializing what yand said.
Those were his words — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nydsa12 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * As previously explained to you, not all fascists are Neo-Nazis, which is even explicitly stated in the source: "We need to do a better job at guarding against all hate crimes, including antisemitic ones [...] But not all hate crimes are committed by organized neo-Nazis." Your edit is factually inaccurate and will not be kept. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  16:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

These are yangs words "Not only is BDS rooted in antisemitic thought and history, hearkening back to fascist boycotts of Jewish businesses, " There is only one group that had fascist boycotts of Jewish businesses which was the nazis in 1930s. You are editorializing out negative content on yang which is really sad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.64.164 (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The source does not say that attacks on Jewish businesses are exclusive to Neo-Nazis. Anyways, this type of discussion should be made at Talk:Andrew Yang in order to garner input from a variety of editors, not just me. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  17:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Reverted my edit on Quantum Supremacy
Amitlevy49 (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Hi, I added a line in the summary of Quantum Supremacy stating that multiple groups have already claimed to have achieved Quantum Supremacy, information which is also available in the body of the article. Considering that the most important question about Quantum Supremacy is "has it been achieved?", it seems important to mention it in the article summary (I am referring to the first paragraph - maybe it has another name). I personally visited the article because I wanted to know if quantum supremacy has been achieved, and at first, assumed it wasn't because the summary didn't mention it.

I'd like to ask why you reverted my edit? Do you disagree with my reasoning?
 * Okay, if it's sourced in the body of the article, it should be fine. Best, ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  23:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

san jose sports
what you said doesnt make any sense. the warriors,As, and Giants all play in the same metro area but are not included on san jose page but why should the 49ers be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9750:A140:D95:6829:9E2A:8ECD (talk) 21:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The home venue of the 49ers are located in Santa Clara, which is located in the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara metropolitan area, defined by the United States Census Bureau. The other teams you mentioned play out of venues located in San Francisco, which are technically located in its own San Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley metro area. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  23:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

if you want to use that as a mesure of its metropolitan area why isnt the standford cardinal in there?????????? thats in the sunnyvale-santa clara-sanjose metropolitan area — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9750:A140:25DD:A65A:7A5C:3C87 (talk) 07:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Stanford Cardinals are a college team, those listed on the page are from professional leagues. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  21:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

san jose state spartans are listed there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9750:A140:E48B:9148:4A20:DDEB (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fantastic Baby
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fantastic Baby you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fantastic Baby
The article Fantastic Baby you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fantastic Baby for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fantastic Baby
The article Fantastic Baby you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fantastic Baby for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Orange man bad
"Orange man bad", a phrase used by supporters of Donald Trump to mock criticism of the former president

"to mock criticism of the former president"- This implies that any/all criticism of the former president is met with "Orange man bad". No. Valid criticism is valid criticism, and is not shut down. The phrase is reserved for completely nonsensical criticism, eg. "Trump made a typo in latest tweet, impeach" You have the gall to say my edit was biased, it is the definition of unbiased, simpleton.

Edit below: "Orange man bad", a phrase used by supporters of Donald Trump to mock nonsensical, unwarranted and/or vilifying criticism of the former president — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hapaxlagomanon (talk • contribs) 20:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Your edit is not neutral per WP:NPOV with those adjectives such as "unwarranted" or "nonsensical" and will not be kept. Keep edit warring and childish name calling and you'll be blocked. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  20:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I did see this edit placed back to the proper version by you and as a UK citizen that follows American politics, I'd like to ask how happy were you when Trump got voted out? --K. Peake 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Fantastic Baby
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:R single album.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:R single album.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk &#124; contribs) 05:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Ballads 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Ballads 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

List of cities by sunshine hours
No, it's not "too long". The more information the better. Do not delete anymore.

And who are you, that you take the right to decide whether it is 'too long' or not too long' ? I think it is the right length. If you want, erase some of your Asian climate. Leave the European part alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.46.97.164 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * What gives you the right to think that you have the final say in whether or not the page meets Wikipedia standards? One more revert and you will be reported for edit warring. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  19:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Astonishing arrogance! You can delete my posts, you can delete my posts even from other articles! Who are you that you think you can do everything ??? Stop deleting my edits. There were sources there.
 * You changed the climate data on Tampere, but you didn't provide an adequate source that contained the information you added to the article. If you need help on adding citations, then please see Help:Referencing for beginners. Also, please assume good faith because I don't just revert people's edits for fun, I have a life outside of Wikipedia. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  20:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Or just to save you the trouble, if you provide me the webpage of the data you found, I'll just add it for you. Not a big deal. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  20:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Come Back Home (2NE1 song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Come Back Home (2NE1 song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have made the initial comments now, which I am telling you because the review will come in more than one stage due to my work schedule. --K. Peake 11:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Come Back Home (2NE1 song)
The article Come Back Home (2NE1 song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Come Back Home (2NE1 song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Come Back Home (2NE1 song)
The article Come Back Home (2NE1 song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Come Back Home (2NE1 song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Re: IU
Hi there, I'm would like to know why you added back hanja to the lead section of IU. As I removed it as per MOS:KO. As far as I'm aware of, majority of the article related to South Korean person contain only hangul in the lead section with exception of K-pop groups/bands. Hence would like to hear your views on this matter, so I can take note on which style (with hanja or no hanja) to go forward with. Thanks you and look forward to hearing your opinion on this.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * * Side note – Hanja was added by sockpuppet DynamiteIce via this revision  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies, there was an edit conflict and I may have re-added some of your edits by accident. Putting the Hanja in the lead is not required anyways and is in the infobox, so you can remove that part if you want. Best, ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  15:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay noted, thanks for the speedy reply. Happy editing.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you and congratulations on your adminship! ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  15:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

April fools hook?
Hello. I saw your DYK nomination of Template:Did you know nominations/Bullshit (G-Dragon song) and I think you might have rich grounds there for an April Fools hook in the form of "... this song is Bullshit?" The only reason I say that is because whenever a hook contains a swear word, you do tend to get an extra level of scrutiny. It's just a suggestion and feel free to ignore if you'd like.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , That is a good idea I totally forgot about that to be honest, I'll consider. Thanks ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  20:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Note about Rollback
Hi, just a reminder, per WP:ROLLBACKUSE, Rollback should only be used to revert unambiguous vandalism, which this edit was not. ― Tartan357  Talk 13:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CL (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blue (Big Bang song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blue (Big Bang song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -ink&fables -- -ink&fables (talk) 06:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Apology
Hi - I am just dropping by to apologise for not responding when you pinged me a few days ago to another user's talk page. I'm afraid that it's been a very busy time for me in real life, and I just didn't have bandwidth for everything that was being asked of me on-wiki; I see that Cass commented to offer advice, and that the user has indicated that they understood the point and wanted to move on, so hopefully that'll be an end of it. Please don't take my unresponsiveness earlier as an indication that I am not interested in addressing improper conduct amongst recent changes patrollers: if you see any further issues, please do let me know and I'll do my best to respond. Thanks for taking the trouble to offer the user advice. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  18:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * It's totally understandable, we all have busy lives outside of the internet. Thank you for your message! ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  04:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blue (Big Bang song)
The article Blue (Big Bang song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blue (Big Bang song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -ink&fables -- -ink&fables (talk) 08:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

DYK for Bullshit (G-Dragon song)
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

BTS awards+noms edit you made
Hi, I just wanted to ask about this edit you made earlier. Were you acting based on a particular guideline from a related MOS, a previously-determined consensus about listicles somewhere, or just the fact that the FLs you mentioned don't use the color templates like we did? Because if it's the last one, that's not actually a valid reason to remove it, as there's nothing wrong with using them the way we did. All FLs don't have to be styled in the exact same way, so just because other pages don't use them for their listicles tables, doesn't mean no lists at all should use them. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I removed the coloring from the listicles table in several awards pages as it seems that this function only serves as "decoration" or "eye-candy". Given that these listicles are not actual real awards, I don't think that they should be treated as such and be given the same weight with industry awards (gold for 1, silver for 2, etc., "win" coloring for every other rank). Yes, FLs don't actually police these types of stylizations, however I included that in my edit summary as it seems the use of color templates in those listicles are only found in these Kpop accolades page added by one editor a couple months back, and similar usage outside of the genre do not use any sort of coloring scheme. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  21:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * our use of the coloring was added in connection w the revamp we did of the page back in 2019 for its submission as an FLC+subsequent approval. It's usage was not cited as inappropriate or purely decorative by reviewers at any point. I also asked about it, and was told that the only prohibition WP has is if the coloring is being used as the only way to present the information (which it was noted it's not) or if there's a local guidance on stylization of listicles that says it shouldn't be used. I cannot speak as to the reason why whoever went around adding it to other articles recently did so, but I'm going to restore it to the BTS one. If a consensus determines in future that no such coloring should be used, I won't question the removal then. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 01:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

"Blue"
Hi Nkon21, there is a discussion here: User talk:Bilorv, which I think you should look at. I am extremely sorry for causing unnecessary trouble for you.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  19:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think of it as a trouble now but I feel you should know. Happy editing.  -ink&amp;fables  «talk»  20:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello ,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our  Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but  there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of It's Hyorish
Hello! Your submission of It's Hyorish at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Meri Kuri
Hello! Your submission of Meri Kuri at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gwillhickers (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for It's Hyorish
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  00:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

It's Hyorish
Okay, I clicked on the article with glee after seeing it on the front page while casually lurking through this website. As an amateur K-pop historian, wow, that give me major ecstasy! Thank you, thank you, thank you so much for the expansion! The time you put to editing this really has paid off, you definitely have gotten my support. One idea I have could be giving the lead single "U-Go-Girl" a standalone article? Here are some sources to use along the way: ; ; —  bee tricks  ~ 💬 · ✉️ 11:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Beetricks Hey, thank you for your message—it's great to see that the articles I expand get attention. Regarding a standalone article for U-Go-Girl, my schedule is actually kind of tight going into Thanksgiving week, therefore I might not get a chance to create any new articles for another another week or so. But you can definitely start the article if you can and I'll help when I get the chance. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  19:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)