User talk:Nkrosse/Archive 1

Hello
Well, well. Hudda thought I'd find you here, of all the places. /GurraJG 18:57, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) (Gustav, if you haven't figured that out...)

Saxby Chambliss - NPOV
I noticed you put the npov tag back on the Saxby Chambliss page. I agee with you on that, but someone will probably remove it unless you justify what you did on the Talk:Saxby Chambliss page (Rogerd 20:36, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC))

Saugatuck River
Please do, as you see appropriate. -- Decumanus 01:39, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)

Big out to Brooklyn
The US Congress page was definitely a mistake. I've no idea how that happened. Thanks for bringing it to my attention & I'll be more careful next time. (I don't even remember what it was I meant to change, only that I didn't even get that far on the page [?] No idea what happened.) --Wangoed 16:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wsptsl01.gif
Do you have a licence for that picture? If you don't it risks getting deleted. All the licence tags are found at Image copyright tags. Just letting you know. &mdash; GurraJG 18:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Nick! It's Richard! 24.44.172.57 05:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC) OOOOOO whos nick?!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pancakesnpopcorn (talk • contribs) 00:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Political Science (Randy Newman song)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Political Science (Randy Newman song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Political Science (Randy Newman song). Redfarmer (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

POPCORN AND PANCAKES
i noticed that u said kayleb was meaningless! explain please! please discuss this with us asap on our talk thing!


 * Relax, Nkrosse is offline now. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 00:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You Open My Eyes
Thanks for redirect of "You Open my Eyes" to "You Open My Eyes". I created the former but noticed the error in its title and created the latter, I was about to do the redirect but found it had already been done!Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

David John Knight and www.lovemarks.com
Hello. please go to Kevin Roberts and make note that the official website of Lovemarks.com exists on wikipedia and cannot be speedily deleted as it pertains to Kevin Roberts and has been inhis article bio for some time what are you doing?,So I think you hastily and inappropriately did this.ssefra 10:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Also Lovemarks itself exists as a topic just enter it and see. so what are you doing?I would appreciate an apology.and you staying off my topics.as you obviously do not know what you are doing asking for the deletion of the official website of www.lovemarks.com I mean is this ok with you or do I have to ask your permission to do anything neophyte thatI am.? Everything was verifiable and more so now what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssefra (talk • contribs) 12:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC) I will have a greater day when you stop telling me what wikipedia is and is not.Sorry you were in the wrong or you could have pointed out a better way of doing things than deletion post haste.You have stated clearly that you want a deletion for www.lovemarks.com as it is or was not notable or something to that effect.Essentially you are wrong as it is twice noted in wikipedia in Kevin Roberts and Lovemarks itself so have nice day yourself too. regards ssefra —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssefra (talk • contribs) 17:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CSN Greatest Hits Album Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CSN Greatest Hits Album Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

NH "Lieutenant Governor"
Hi there - Good fix on the lieutenant governor entry for the New Hampshire infobox. I wish I'd thought of it, but I'm glad you did! --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I realized what you were trying to do. Didn't mean to sound snarky on my edit summary. Happy editing! --Esprqii (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)