User talk:Nm.bhawana

Ways to improve Swami Purnachaitanya
Hello, Nm.bhawana,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Swami Purnachaitanya! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill}} and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 19:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Rosguill, It'll be great if you can help with the copy editing. Can you let me know how to do that. signed,Nm.bhawana

Nm.bhawana (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , there's a few different issues that need addressing. Some are pretty easy style corrections to comply with the manual of style, such as converting section headings to sentence-style capitalization, or avoiding the use of bold outside of the lead. There's also quite a few unnecessary translations of things (we don't need translations of the meanings of common English names like Alexander or Frederick, and it's not clear that we need to translate English words into Hindu concepts like consciousness –> chaitanya). It's also not particularly encyclopedic to include details about the subject's future travel plans.
 * As for the neutrality stuff, there's some examples of puffery, particularly in the lead. Additionally, directly quoting the titles of his talks in the "Forums addressed' section lets the non-neutrality of those titles bleed into the article. You may also want to ping the editor who actually added that tag to see if they have any other thoughts.
 * If you need more help, I'd suggest that you check the teahouse for one-off questions and general guidance, or the adopt-a-user program if you want more support from an experienced editor over a longer period of time. signed,Rosguill talk 17:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you need more help, I'd suggest that you check the teahouse for one-off questions and general guidance, or the adopt-a-user program if you want more support from an experienced editor over a longer period of time. signed,Rosguill talk 17:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you need more help, I'd suggest that you check the teahouse for one-off questions and general guidance, or the adopt-a-user program if you want more support from an experienced editor over a longer period of time. signed,Rosguill talk 17:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Nm.bhawana, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Swami Purnachaitanya have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you so much for your detailed inputs, I'll study these and make the required changes. Didn't understand the copyright part as the content is originally written, but will check for plagiarism. signed,Nm.bhawana

July 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Swami Purnachaitanya. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  GermanJoe (talk) 12:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you so much for your inputs. I understood the feedback. It'll be great if you can help me further with the copy editing and other errors that wikipedia is suggest. I want to include reference to the two music cds he has launched, so how do we put it up here? Can you let me know how to do that. signed,Nm.bhawana


 * Hello Nm.bhawana, if you want to include a list of publications (including audio publications), that's fine. Such lists are often added in biographical articles, usually in a separate list section near the end of the main content. However you should try to focus on major, noteworthy publications (not every minor article or speech needs to be listed). And you should also avoid to add shop links or other URLs with a commercial purpose. Just list noteworthy publications offline with their bibliographic details (such as author(s), title, year of publication, publisher, ISBN or similar publication indices). If you want to include additional details about these publications beyond a mere listing (such as a review or a detailed description for example), you'll need independent 3rd-party sources. Hope this helps a bit. GermanJoe (talk) 16:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * By the way, I believe your previous "ping" with "Re|GermanJoe" didn't work. If you want to make sure that a ping works, please sign your post using 4 tilde characters (~) at the end. As far as I know, manually created signatures will not trigger a correct notification. A signature with 4 tilde characters would look like this: GermanJoe (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Backdating maintenance tags
Please don't do that.  Mini  apolis  00:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, can you check now if the page looks ok? Also, it says in the box it's orphan, however, I've linked it to a couple of pages, let me know if that works. --92.98.191.165 (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)nm.bhawana

COI
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. Please read the guidance below.
 * If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jimfbleak. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. It's pretty clear that at least one undeclared paid editor has been involved in this promo. Also read the following regarding writing an article:


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. The article has references, but a number of them are press releases, interviews or are based on non-RS sources
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your text is all about what you sell, little about the company. The number of employees is unsourced and only in the infobox, nothing at all on profits or turnover.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. The article is all about what they sell, little about the company itself. This is a classic company promo This is what we sell&mdash;bit of historyl&mdash;bullet list of awards  In addition we get SuperShine™ -it's not our job to protect your trade marks, comprehensive details of how to use the company and even a price list! The notability of the company doesn't depend on instructions for using its services or what it charges, that's pure spam, whatever you think
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x?. Also note that many articles would have been accepted before the notability guidelines were made stricter. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)