User talk:Nmthom

May 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zotero with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at EndNote with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello Nmthom. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Edits have been accepted previously without issue. How do you suggest removing this section from the EndNote page?Nmthom (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * What is your justification for removing it? It is notable and verifiable content.  If you take issue with accuracy, completeness, or bias, perhaps the sections can be amended.  But I think it is a tough sell to remove them. --Karnesky (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)