User talk:Nmyers

Universal Enterprise Infrastructure
In what way does this resemble an intelligent agent? Experts and DBs do not imply agency. Does it control? Does it learn? Please do not use Wikipedia for self-promoting unreferenced systems. --moxon 15:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I modivied the links. It is still not clear what the UEI is other than a DB standard, or is that it? IMO maybe an example earlier in the atricle could assist the definition. What is available and where? Thanks. --moxon 17:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Universal Enterprise Infrastructure, Neutral Third Party, N3P Sverige AB, Business process interoperability, Information silo and Conforming Infra Provider, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! JonHarder 03:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Confirmation emails
You don't need a confirmation email for each article, you can do one of two things. First, you can send a statement to permissions at wikimedia dot org stating that you release the content under the GFDL, or alternately, put a notice on your website that the content is released under the GFDL (that way, the information can be used in any article without having to go through the process again). Since you've mentioned a few times that you want the information to be available and used by anyone, you might seriously want to consider putting a statement that that effect on your site, otherwise the site is assumed by law to by copyrighted. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 18:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * N3P has added the GFDL to its copyright and we've notified Wikipedia. I appreciate your help. Norm


 * Fantastic! All of the articles should be back now, just drop me a line if any still have the copyvio notice. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 20:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

BPI Initiative
I have added a "" template to the article BPI Initiative, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

AfD nomination of Commonware
I have nominated Commonware, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Commonware&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MrOllie (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rob Peters


A tag has been placed on Rob Peters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 22:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rob Peters


The article Rob Peters has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  elektrik SHOOS  21:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rob Peters


The article Rob Peters has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:N: The article does not contain, nor have I been able to find multiple reliable secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of the subject in order to establish notability under the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe deckertalk to me 05:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rob Peters


A tag has been placed on Rob Peters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. 99.184.128.194 (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Initiative (enterprise)


The article Initiative (enterprise) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced dictionary definition remaining unsourced for almost 13 years and which appears to violate WP:NOTDIC. There seems to be no reasonable scenario whereby someone would be looking for and benefit from finding this article. Incoming links are similarly unhelpful."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  21:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)