User talk:Nn-user

Hi - welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your comment on Talk:Kwanzaa: Here on Wikipedia, we try to keep discussion focused on the article content, not on the people involved in the discussion. This is also longstanding policy - see No personal attacks. Thanks for understanding. CDC (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * User GWB is not a speedy delete. There is a vote on at WP:TFD, that is how it will be decided whether it will be deleted. Izehar 20:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

It's not the recreation of a deleted page. Whether it will be deleted will be determined by a vote at WP:TFD. Izehar 20:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC) It was unlawfully deleted because the vote is not over. It is not a speedy and is not going to be deleted. Whether it will be deleted, will be determined by the vote. If you revert again, I will block you for a violation of the WP:3RR. Izehar 20:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC) We have the deletion policy which you are violating and you added the "speedy template" more than three times within the same 24 hour period. If you add it again, you will be blocked. Izehar 20:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is a recreation of a deletedpage, please get your facts straight before accusing me of anything--Nn-user 20:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Then you would be lying, on both counts, there is no such thing as "encylopedic law" it was deleted, then recreated, it is a recreation of a deleted page: can't get much more literl than that--Nn-user 20:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, since none of by edits were actually the same, anyone who tried to imply that I was violating the 3RR would be a liar--Nn-user 20:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, and you would be a liar then, as none of my edits are actually the same--Nn-user 20:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, if you're going to be gaming the system, then I think it's better if I just protect the page. Izehar 20:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Altering edits slightly to get around the 3RR is called "gaming the system" and is indeed a 3RR violation. 3RR is not an entitlement to three reverts a day, it is an electric fence to stop revert wars. android  79  20:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Check out how many people are linking to it. The majority are in favour of keeping it. Templates_for_deletion Deleting it is vandalism. Jooler 23:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * "Keep it because it's popular" is not valid. Wikipedia isn't a democracy, and deletion isn't vandalism. android  79  23:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks from rogerd
Hi Nn-user- Thanks for your support on my RfA. I appreciate the kind words that you used in your comments. If I can be of any service please leave me a message --rogerd 01:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)