User talk:Nn123645/2007/December

Tract 90
I purposefully removed a large amount of content from this article because it does not describe the content of Tract 90, but instead the content of the 39 Articles. I explained this in my edit summary. Your message suggests that I did not explain this. You don't seem to understand the difference between these two documents. They are related, but a summary of the contents of one document is not the same as a summary of the contents of the other. Noel S McFerran 03:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Makes a bit more sense now, though I'm still confused. I have reverted my revert to your revision of the page. --Nn123645 03:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Ad Tags
Hi! Thanks for marking Bratfest at Tiffany's with the tags. I keep telling them to stop, so I'm going to have to start warning them. Again, thanks. BlackPearl14 Pirate Lord-ess 04:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * np, Thanks for cleaning up the page :). I just added the future book notice tag, as well as the unreferenced and stub tags. --Nn123645 (talk) 12:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Nn123645! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Status bot
I fixed it you are just supposed to put please note that the bot is extremely slow you may have to do it manually at User:StatusBot/Status/Nn123645 also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:StatusBot/Status/Nn123645&action=history shows that the bot has been working for those 3 weeks for you--Java7837 (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahh, ok. Thanks. =D Was wondering what I was doing wrong :). I read something about making the status say busy. Does that require updating the status bot page? --Nn123645 23:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not know how to make it say busy sorry--Java7837 (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Punk Rock
such as the Ramones, Sex Pistols, and The Clash were recognized as the vanguard of a new musical movement what is the basis of this cliam. Dangolaenican (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahh, see your point there. I agree that the statement should defiantly be reworded. However, removing the entire section just because of a few words is like throwing the baby out with the bath water. --Nn123645 (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

The article on Sex Pistols is also written like advertisement. Dangolaenican (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * It seems Dangolaenican is DGJSNRNKJB K, who was just blocked. I've asked that same admin to step in. Wwwhatsup (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * That makes sense. He is now vandalizing and violating WP:Point. --Nn123645 (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I just filed a report on WP:AIV --Nn123645 (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Very good. Once he's gone, we can think about rephrasing that intro. It doesn't quite add up as it is. Wwwhatsup (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * He was indef blocked, but is back again under a different sock puppet. Nn123645 (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Both the article punk rock and film noir are written like advs. In film noir, Alton is given much weightage. OrderOfLaden (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi I am also Hytioplion in film noir. OrderOfLaden (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey. You son of botch, motherfuckers stay here. I am back again with the name OrderOfSaddam. Check the edit history of Film noir. I am also the user Hytiplion there. Spread your communist propaganda. OrderOfSaddam (talk) 18:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi I am back again with new name OrderOfBush 2. OrderOfBush 2 (talk) 18:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm off to watch football. Add new aliases to WP:Requests for checkuser/Case/OrderOfLaden. Wwwhatsup (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi I am back again as OrderOfBush 3. I will later come as OrderOfBush 4. OrderOfBush 3 (talk) 18:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Templating admins
Giving a vandal warning to an established user helps how? Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, got the wrong person. --Nn123645 (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. No harm done. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the 'shiny', buddy. Maybe you'd like to get your userpage protected, doesn't look like he's gonna give up. Have a nice day. Funeral 18:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm considering it, for right now I'll just see how it goes. I'm wondering how he keeps coming back with new usernames if account creation is blocked, surely he is going to run out of IPs eventually. --Nn123645 (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Why?
Why you have put a sockpuppet template on my userpage. I have nothing to do with Hytioplion or something other. Then why you have put it there? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Your username came up in this checkuser case. Which is why I placed the tag on your userpage. --Nn123645 (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Bradford-with-Beswick
Have you noticed that until Oldgrapes came along and edited it, Bradford-with-Beswick was an actual article? Do you think it should be merged with another, more approriate article? --Kannie | talk 03:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Just noticed that, I do think a merge would be good, or a revert. One of the two. --Nn123645 (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think I'll revert. Thanks --Kannie | talk 19:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Peeps
Original Message on User_Talk:Merovingian Hey, I was wondering why you removed an very large chunk of the peeps article. Thanks, -- Nn123645 (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Continued discussion Hi. Did you think to look at the article? It was so long because somebody had copied and pasted the content over and over. Take a look at the long, unformatted block of text inappropriately placed in the references section. You'll notice that it begins to repeat itself again and again. --Merovingian (T, C) 02:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that right before I saw the "You have new messages" header. Thanks for the explanation =). -- Nn123645 (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, no problem. I saw it on the long pages and list and thought "either somebody messed with it, or somebody really likes peeps".  Happy editing.  --Merovingian (T, C) 02:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

geo-stubs
Hi - good to see you doing some stub sorting, but could I please ask that - when you do geo-stubs - where possibly you use the coun try specific stub? Saves me having to resort them later fro. Almost every country in the world now has its own geo-stub in the form CountryName-geo-stub. If in doubt, try it with preview, and if it doesn't work then use geo-stub. Most should though. Thanks - and keep up the good work! Grutness...wha?  23:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * k, I will do that. Thanks for the notice :D. -- Nn123645 (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

clue bot
hi there, thanks for your friendly note. I think you own or program clue bot? I don't like that thing, it was upsetting to receive a "warning" from him. I think this sort of thing confuses and upsets users. I hope you don't think I was wrong to revert him, but when I went to the page for reporting cluebot errors it seemed rather complicated, so I didn't (sorry). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.52.64 (talk) 15:20, December 23, 2007


 * I'm not the owner of ClueBot, that would be Cobi. While your edits were legitimate there are many people who do not try to improve wikipedia and instead Vandalize it. Since there are on average about 3 edits per second to wikipedia (from what I have observed) it is next to impossible to be able to check every one so ClueBot and a few other Anti-Vandalism bots exist to combat this threat. The reason you were reverted is because your edit had the word "Nazi" in it and it was a small edit. Usually such edits are made when people change information to say for example "Actor X is an actor..." to "Actor X is a nazi...". I have opened up a report for you on the false positives page. As far as reverting the bot, ClueBot does not revert the same user or article more than once in 24 hours as per the message listed on its userpage. -- Nn123645 (talk) 20:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar Award for you!

 * Thanks :D -- Nn123645 (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)