User talk:Nn123645/2009/January

Flagged Revs Trial - reply
Original Message

I noticed your response on the straw poll for the flagged revs trial and am a bit confused because you added a weak oppose, yet appear to be supporting flagged revs in your reasoning. I was wondering if you were aware of this, or it was simply a mistake. Thanks, —Nn123645 (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Continued Discussion

The trial, as I understand it, is about testing out some code that will affect all users globally, not on selected pages and selected ip ranges. So the code that is proposed tested can not be used in the manner I want. Did that make sense?--Anss123 (talk) 09:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ahh ok, the trial configuration is a bit confusing, but the way it will be setup (if it passes) is that Flagged Revisions will be able to be enabled on a page by page basis to any page in the Main or Portal namespaces. The configuration would add a new user class, surveyor. Any user granted Surveyor or any Administrator will be able to change whether Flagged Revisions is enabled for that page. So, no it won't affect every article, only the pages which an Administrator or Surveyor decides to enable it on. —Nn123645 (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hundslund Priory
What happened here? UnCatBot removed the tag for no apparent reason. Colonies Chris (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hmm, looking into it. -- Nn123645 (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)