User talk:Nn9586K



Hello, Nn9586K, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vijayawada, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Imphal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bodhidharma. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

You are strongly encouraged (but not required) to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Concubinage, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Concubinage, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rahul Roushan, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alt News, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alt News. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 21:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chengdu J-20, you may be blocked from editing. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 17:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)