User talk:Nnadigoodluck/archives/9

__NONEWSECTIONLINK__

Luis García (footballer, born 1972) move
Hi! I see you have moved back the page. It’s now the 2nd time this happens. I’ll admit it, at first I was a little confused, but now I want to talk with you about it.

I’ve noticed you’re a page mover, therefore, you moved back the page upon somebody else’s request. I can understand that the 1st time this happened I did some things wrong, but this time I’ve tried to do it the right way (and I believe I did). I’ll explain myself, after the page had been moved back for the first time I read carefully the WP:COMMONNAME and made sure that my move didn’t go against it. Once I ensured the move followed WP:COMMONNAME I opened a talk page to discuss a future move, with a proper explanation. I didn’t do this the 1st time, and I understand I was unfairly moving the page, but now I have. After waiting for over half a month, I didn’t get any reply, nobody was there to discuss the move proposal. So, having presented my proposal by opening a polite discussion (which nobody replied to), I assumed I could rightfully move the page.

Here is the problem, the page has been moved back again, apparently upon a user named Ortizesp’s request in WP:RM/TR using the same explanation/reasoning that was used the 1st time: “undiscussed page move that seems to go against WP:COMMONNAME” which is false, I proved the move doesn’t go against it plus a discussion to move the page was open. Furthermore, the real problem is not only that but the fact that this user requests to move back a page under the statement that it has not been discussed, but doesn’t even try to reply to the discussion. It’s kind of inconsiderate, did I explain?

As mentioned earlier, you’re just a page mover; but the same way I did things wrong the 1st time, now I’m highlighting that this other user is doing it wrong and acting selfishly to certain extent as it recriminated my actions in the past but now is not acting according to his own judgment; again, you’re a page mover, as you were the one involed in both cases I want to ask for your help, because a solution is needed. Thank you! SrEragon (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, I noticed you moved the article for the second time to the same name after you posted a request to move the article and got no comments. I'll advise you to start a proper requested move on the article's talk page and let it run its course without disrupting it or taking matters into your own hands. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 16:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Butt (surname)
Hey, I noticed that you moved Butt (name) to Butt (surname), but you didn't leave a redirect. Was that intentional? Ghinga7 (talk) 16:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I left a redirect. See here. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 16:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oof, not sure how I missed that. I could have sworn it said that you hadn't...  Ghinga7 (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Godwin_Izomor
Hello Nnadigoodluck. Am currently addressing your concerns about the page. However I can assure you there is no COI. I WAS NOT PAID to create the page. best regardsGbesimi Samuel (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

‎PERSONAL APPEAL TO JOIN AFROCINE 2020
Hello NnadiGoodluck, how have you been? I want to appreciate you for your diligent work on Wikipedia especially regarding administrative work on WikiProject Nigeria. Can I kindly request that you to participate in the Months of African Cinema (starting in October) by adding at least one article entry. This goes a long way in enhancing the impact of the contest. Just one article from you will be very much appreciated. If you are unsure on what article to create, can I suggest Stanlee Ohikhuare, an award-winning director that definitely passes WP:NDIRECTOR, feel free to ignore and pick a subject of your choice if you so desire. God bless you richly sir! HandsomeBoy (talk) 12:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * okay coordinator. Will see what I can do about it. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬

The Scream 5 page should be moved to Untitled Scream sequel or Scream (2022 film)
Hi. Hope all is well. I noticed that you recently moved the article page from Scream (2022 film) to Scream 5. I just wanted to understand the reasoning behind that decision. According to Paramount Pictures, the title of this movie hasn't actually been confirmed as Scream 5. It appears that certain media outlets are making that assumption, even though the recent teaser on the official Scream Twitter account did not show a numbered Scream title. What lends more credence to the above statement is that the directors involved have not connected this project and referred to it as Scream 5 either. Additionally, Variety noted that Spyglass Media Group and Paramount are labeling this movie as a "relaunch" of the series. I find this case to be similar to what Universal Pictures, Blumhouse Productions and Miramax did to Halloween (2018 film) in that front. In light of such evidence, I suggest the idea of re-titling the aforementioned article page to either Untitled Scream sequel or Scream (2022 film), to accommodate the change. Elainasla (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * hello and welcome to my talk page. The move request was requested by at WP:RMTR. See the request here. Pinging them to chime in. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 10:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Thank you so much. I'll do that. Have a nice day! Elainasla (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Santos Hu
Hi if you don’t mind could you move this one back to draft please? The sourcing is not adequate for a BLP. Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , ✅. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 20:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Mccapra (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Link in page titled Kiki Mordi
Hello Nnadigoodluck.

The link you removed is from a profile of the subject which I think is insightful. I have checked the guidelines and do not see how a detailed profile of a subject is an unnecessary link to their Wikipedia page. Unless you mean the placement, the link is needed.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AgunnaKanayo (talk • contribs) 09:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , it's a non reliable source and shouldn't be added again. Alternatively, the sources in the article is enough. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 09:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * All of this editor's recent links have been to the same website. Doug Weller  talk 09:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , oh, I had no idea. Seems they might be the owner of the website and using it for promotion. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 09:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Drezden
Hi, you moved the draft article for Drezden (album) to mainspace, but an article for the album already existed at Drezden (Drezden album). I've requested a histmerge as it appears the primary author simply recreated the article at the new name after the first was moved to draft back in October 2019. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * oh, I had no idea, I guess the editor was gaming the system. I only tried moving a stale draft that looks good, instead of tagging it with WP:G13. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 21:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Muhammadu Buhari
If you insist on dividing up the summary why not add more information? Because the section now looks banal and egregious.

Imperialization40 (talk)
 * the lead of an article is meant to briefly tell you who the subject of an article is and not to discuss them. That's what sections are for. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 23:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted. Thank you for the clarification. But it'd be great to up the ante by adding more information to the summary/article, similar to say Olusegun Obasanjo article. Imperialization40 (talk)
 * the lead at Obasanjo's article looks fine and simple, same as Buhari's own in its current form. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Keisha Omilana
Hello, ,

I've gone to check the link you provided to the discussion about the previous page on the Olori. It seems that notability was what was in question there.

Although I was unaware that this was the reason for the page's deletion, I have seen that in the time since that event, the Omilanas have apparently been featured on Access Hollywood. That would speak to their general notability, wouldn't it?

I'm really not sure how to proceed. I'll rewrite it for a start, but beyond that it does seem that there is also a significant bias against our traditions of hereditary perpetuity (the idea that you're not a prince if your last reigning ancestor lived in the 1500s was expressly stated in the discussion). I'd greatly appreciate your further counsel on the subject.

Yours sincerely,

O.ominirabluejack (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , for sure, rewriting the article is good for a start and I will see how it goes. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 05:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Delete
Hello. You have deleted my article - Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan. The article was removed for advertising purposes. I unsubscribed to the discussion page of this article with argumentation, but you deleted this article without discussion. Could you restore the article and put it up for discussion for deletion. I believe that the advertising style can be removed, because the importance of the article is observed. Thanks. Namerst (talk) 08:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for taking the time to review the articles I created. I hope your weekend is going well. Best wishes from Los Angeles,  // Timothy ::  talk  07:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , it's going absolutely well. Thanks for stopping by. Best, — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 07:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

To draft please
Hi would you mind moving DAX (rapper) and Global Conservation to draft please? All the best Mccapra (talk) 22:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , ✅ —[[User:Nnadigoodluck|'''Nnadigoodluck ''']] █ █ █ 23:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and Yamaha FZ6R and Marco Broome-Hernandez. Many thanks. Mccapra (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , ✅ First one has been a redirect since 2016, so, I restored the redirect and moved the second. —[[User:Nnadigoodluck|'''Nnadigoodluck ''']] █ █ █ 06:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you please tell me the problem with my FZ6R edit. I even included references now, what is the problem. Just because it has been redirected since 2016 does not mean the information is correct or accurate. What is the problem.(RideThe6 (talk) 15:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC));

Yamaha FZ6R Page Reverts.
Why do you continue to revert the Yamaha FZ6R page back to a de-direct link. The re-direct link that it links to has zero information on the bike itself. The last time I checked this is a place for information. If you have a better edit than mine, then please post it, or feel free to edit mine. Stop reverting pages and redirecting. I suspect you are nothing more than a useless bot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RideThe6 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Mayor of Lagos
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Mayor of Lagos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Mayor of Lagos
The article The Mayor of Lagos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Mayor of Lagos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)