User talk:Nnnn 130

Recent edit to Mega (service)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mega (service), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

no thanks need that not erase my modification because is true of happen


 * Stop editing disruptively (see WP:Disruptive editing), or you will be WP:Blocked. Flyer22 (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mega (service), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

my friend is banned the account and their pay attention wont change this


 * First-hand accounts (or second-hand) do not constitute reliable sources. Changes to the article should be based on published sources, such as news stories. —C.Fred (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mega (service). —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —C.Fred (talk) 01:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Do not ignore me, I'm telling the truth

Do not take my hair, this is true, I do both already unlocked, you are violating privacy


 * We're not saying you're not telling the truth. We're saying that (1) you've added material with reliable sources and (2) you've done so persistently after being told to stop. —C.Fred (talk) 15:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

not interesting, and adding my thinks now now now because us are privacity violating


 * I have removed your edits again from Mega (service). There are two key issues of Wikipedia policy that they do not comply with:
 * There is no citation of a reliable source, such as a magazine or newspaper story, where the claims have been published.
 * Articles should be written from neutral point of view. That means that, if there have been accounts suspended, and the suspensions have been covered in reliable sources, we can mention them in the articles. However, we should not advocate that people stop using the service, as you appear to have done.
 * If you'd like additional clarification, you may discuss the edits here. However, do not re-add the material to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

leave me alone and do not do more editions you understand it

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mega (service). —C.Fred (talk) 23:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

already tired of you, if I denounced blocks for violation of privacy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nnnn 130 (talk • contribs)


 * I'm not sure how you see a "violation of privacy" coming into this. It's outright dirsuption. Therefore:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —C.Fred (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

fiuck you need change now now now now now i will denounced for you unlock now now