User talk:Nnnnnnmmmmmmoooooopppppp

Welcome!
Hello, Nnnnnnmmmmmmoooooopppppp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Flat Out   let's discuss it   11:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

February 2014
Hello, I'm Anupmehra. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Australian flag debate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anup Mehra  ✈ 11:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Nnnnnnmmmmmmoooooopppppp, you are invited to the Teahouse
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Australian flag debate, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''You are reuested to leave an edit summary everytime you make an edit. '' Anup  Mehra  ✈ 00:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Australian flag debate
Hello, I'm Anup. You are requested to not repeatedly add unsourced content in the article Australian flag debate. Your changes made to the page fails Wikipedia verifiability policy and to some extent, Wikipedia Original research. See, WP:PROVEIT. If you wish to reinstate the content in the article, discuss the issue on the Article's talk page to reach a consensus. Thank you! Anup Mehra  ✈ 00:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Australian flag debate, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 01:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Australian flag debate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 01:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Australian flag debate, you may be blocked from editing. I have deleted specific paragraphs individually so you can see what the problems for each para are in comments. Basically, you are using WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and adding references in support that are completely unrelated to the debate that you are using as data to formulate your own view on the subject. You must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented. Wayne (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)