User talk:Nnnudibranch

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Doves - The Last Broadcast cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Doves - The Last Broadcast cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Confused
You appear to be confused. This is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. We are not Microsoft tech support. Your comment on Talk:Windows Vista has been removed as a result. --Yamla 21:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Daytrotter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 00:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Daytrotter
Looks like the article will stick around.— oac old american century talk @ 07:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Aquatic ape hypothesis
Please note the discussion here. WLU (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Zune 80
Hey Nnnudibranch, I've reverted your edit to the article Zune 80 (the addition of specs about the device) as I think the better solution is to have an external link to the specs, or to incorporate them into the article. Let me know if you have another solution. - Mysekurity 04:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. - kollision (talk) 12:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't seem to edit your talk page. Anyway, it is ironic though since I removed a whole chunk from the article which was similar to the stupidity of a pointless attack, you know?