User talk:No-conjecture

Welcome
Hello, No-conjecture, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Mary of Clopas have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! StAnselm (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry but the helpfully and friendly advice by St Anselm above is correct. You should not have made a second insert into Mary of Clopas without using Talk:Mary of Clopas page to discuss. And also content reverted for the same reason. Be careful if reverting it again within 24 hours as you may unwittingly trigger WP:3RR. Your contributions are valued and may be useful to the project, but please follow the friendly advice given by StAnselm above. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Shooting of Michael Brown, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your mistaken. The reliable published source I used was the video from Ferguson’s Market which does not show Michael Brown on “camera stealing a box of Swisher Sweets cigars and forcefully shoving a Ferguson Market clerk.” Brown did not steel a box of cigars nor push the store clerk on his way out of the store. Perhaps you prefer to call Michael Brown a thug and a thief?