User talk:No2islamophobia

This is your only warning; if you use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- VViking Talk Edits 19:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Big Ben, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 19:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Ben. '' That is not what the source cited says, and your personal attacks and threats againbst other editors are not acceptable. Please cease this disruption'' RolandR (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Big Ben shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You know very well what the cited article says, namely that the design was copied. Yet you are insisting on inserting text into the article saying that Big Ben, itself, was stolen. I'm not going to edit-war with you. You will be blocked and someone will remove the misleading text. Problem solved.'' &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 19:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)