User talk:NoRevisedHistory

Same old, same old
Let me repeat what I said to you when you were editing as User:50.151.118.112:

Practically every edit you've made in your brief career here has been to either add your own opinion about something, with no source, or to remove sourced information, because you don't agree with it. I suggest that you read some Wikipedia policies to get a better handle on how we operate here. First, all information must be verifiable, using citations from reliable sources. When information is properly sourced, do not remove it without first discussion the deletion and getting a consensus to do so. Second, things that you just "know" to be true aren't acceptable to be added to articles, we call it original research. Finally, Wikipedia is to be edited with a neutral point of view; please leave your personal prejudices at the door, they're not wanted here.

In a small number of edits, you have managed to break each one of these policies several times - please do not do so again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Just because you've created an account name doesn't change a thing, do not delete sourced information without a consensus to do so, and do not insert your personal opinions into articles. These are not my opinions, these are Wikipedia policies. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, changing my comment on the User:50 talk page into one praising you is vandalism, and has been reverted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * For some reading over your holiday break, try WP:CONSENSUS, WP:VERIFIABILITY, WP:RELIABLE SOURCES and WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)