User talk:NoRwEgIaNbAcTeRiUm

In response to your feedback
Hello! Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Hello! Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Hello! Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
Hello! Thanks for your feedback! If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Welcome!
Hello, NoRwEgIaNbAcTeRiUm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of James V. Solheim


A tag has been placed on James V. Solheim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I think you just need to add your name here.

Lectonar (talk) 13:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
See 2 posts above, in the tutorial (Tutorial/Talk pages). But I am a bit surprised, as you already answer feedback requests, so I would have expected for you to know the basics at least.

Lectonar (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
see above

Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Your note about rollback
Hi NoRwEgIaNbAcTeRiUm, unfortunately you only have four edits to articles and only one revert...meaning that I have little on which to judge how well you would use the rollback feature. I suggest you read up on vandalism and practice reverting with the undo feature for a week or so. Once you've done that, feel free to re-request rollback, either on my talk page or at the permissions page. Best. Acalamari 22:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Feedback
Regarding this edit, an admin will fix what, exactly? If it wasn't for vandalism like this, most pages wouldn't need to be protected in the first place. RashersTierney (talk) 23:10, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your Feedback Dashobard comments
Hello and thanks for helping at Feedback Dashboard! However, I believe you should put better effort with replies such as this. Considering that the user was new, it's unlikely they are familiar with the guidelines. When users are having troubles, consider suggesting that they visit Tutorial. If they mention that their article was deleted, consider suggesting Writing better articles. If you have questions, contact me at my talk page. Cheers! SwisterTwister  talk  22:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)