User talk:NoTimeToTalk

Editing
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Need not to tag every edit as an DISRUPTIVE edit as such things might only lead to an bigger issue.

I had provided enough citation and an book too the 120MM LOVA propellant! However I Wrongly mentioned it as explosives,that's an error.It is an well known fact that the arjun is the only 120MM Barreled tank out there in india,and also the book which I have provided might provide some more clarity on the LOVA propellants on arjun.

user:Echo1Charlie Please do not tag other editors edits as unconstructive stuff/ disruptive edits without even actually discussing about the issue. This will only lead to ego clash and Which might lead to Edit warring. Which will only results bigger dispute.If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You are requested to discuss about adding smoke and heat rounds to the Arjun's armament list☺️.

User:Echo1Charlie And also about adding new sub title caled ==Ammunitions== under the arjun design catogary. Which would include all the details about the Ammunitions used in arjun tank.

Picture
Greetings, The picture you uploaded to the article is removed due to 2 reasons — so the change you made is unnecessary and childish, so please refrain from doing this again and again, I hope you understand. —Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It has name written on it
 * The image you're trying to upload to the article and the image already present there  are same

Echo1Charlie Childish?? Woof, never seen some editor making personal attack by mentioning other editors work as childish.

Mentioning other editors work as Childish or useless stuff will lead to banning under personal attack catogary,sugar coating it will not give an excuse.

There's no regulation in Wikipedia which depicts to remove an pic coz it contains name in it. (Except copyright). NoTimeToTalk (talk) 16:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * What would you get by changing same image with same image, that too of lower resolution and writings on it? —Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Echo1Charlie Lower resolution??? I would honestly recommended u to see the images clearly or if u can't see the difference or any major changes in the image quality,it doesn't mean others are blind or would have any eye related issues, anyone could spot the image resolution difference. The image has higher shade I mean the lighting is better than that of the old one. (No PeRsoNAl AtTacKs) NoTimeToTalk (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Echo1Charlie It is highly recommended to go through Wikipedi citation rules ,as it does not state to remove an statement coz it is old, every one knows that the arjun has smoke and heat firing capabilities, as u could even see in this pic. https://www.drdo.gov.in/120-mm-armaments-arjun-mbt

We can't rely entirely on drdo and ofb documents as they won't publish most of the details and Wikipedia does not expect the source to be from designer/manufacturer. NoTimeToTalk (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * A simple question  - picture you're trying upload (resolution 3,508 × 2,343 pixels, file size: 4.23 MB) vs picture already present in there  (resolution 5,760 × 3,840 pixels, file size: 8.53 MB) — which is higher according to you? —Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Helios007&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Helios007. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1047108752
 * PLEASE REFER THE DISCUSSION I LEFT ON ARJUN TALK PAGE AND MY EDIT HISTORY* . I had made everything clear regarding the fabricated claims made by User: Echo1Charlie.

Time To Do Something Other Than Keep Trying To Talk Here
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)