User talk:NoWeAreNotOkay

December 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Clickbait, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 00:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

The 2 sentences I added didn't require a source. You don't hold a monopoly for edits. Please don't delete shit because you have a stick up your ass. I'm sure you can understand how 2 sentences that didn't contain any data wouldn't require being cited. NoWeAreNotOkay (talk) 02:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, you are surely smart enough to understand that the kind of nonsensical text you added has no place in an encyclopedia unless it has been discussed in depth in multiple reliable sources! Best, --bonadea contributions talk 23:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

It was a quick example of what click bait is. Wikipedia isn't an encyclopedia nor is it considered a reliable source. NoWeAreNotOkay (talk) 02:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Partly correct. Wikipedia is absolutely not considered a reliable source, but it is an encyclopedia. The example you added had no explanation, no context, and will make no sense to any of the readers, except for those who recognise the name – so how is it supposed to help or serve as an example?  And again, sources are required. If that YT channel has been identified by multiple reliable sources as an example of clickbait, feel free to add a sentence about it (neutrally phrases) with sources. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. NoWeAreNotOkay (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)