User talk:No name for obvious reasons

September 2016
Where to start on this edit? Overall your addition was misleading to the point of verging on vandalism. Don't so this. Meters (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Obviously this contentious edit was in no way a minor edit. You knew that very well as shown by the user name you chose to create for this edit.
 * 2) This is improperly sourced. There were no sources for the claims about responses by several LGBT and activist groups. In fact, the group Stonewall actually praised the school for their rapid response.
 * 3) You give a direct quote with no information about who made the quote.
 * 4) The person in question was a long-retired former teacher; however, your edit left het impression that he was a staff member.