User talk:Noadware

Free advice
I suggest that you (or someone) audit the NoAdware article and pay more attention to the edits made by other users. Glancing through the article I see some sneaky editing going on - for example, there is the statement "However, according to the test, NoAdware identified and disabled only 54% of the spyware in the test machine", supposedly supported by a citation to adwarereport.com. The word "however" is a sly POV word that shouldn't be used, and there is no "only" in the citation. The article is already tagged as needing cleanup, somebody who understands Wikipedia referencing should do so, and should check closely the accuracy of what's being said about the product. --CliffC (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)