User talk:NoahZJones1973

November 2021
Hello, I'm Peaceray. Your recent edit(s) to the page Chester A. Arthur appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  See https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/presidents/chester-a-arthur/ Peaceray (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chester A. Arthur, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 23:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chester A. Arthur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   Peaceray (talk) 01:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 03:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Edit-warring
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. – NJD-DE (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 02:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)